Literature DB >> 11950177

Minimally invasive surgery for obstructed labour: a review of symphysiotomy during the twentieth century (including 5000 cases).

Kenneth Björklund1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compile and make available essential data on symphysiotomy for evaluation in the struggle against maternal and fetal mortality and morbidity from obstructed labour, which causes the death of 50,000 women each year in low-resourced countries.
DESIGN: Retrospective review of literature. SAMPLE: Five thousand symphysiotomies and 1200 caesarean sections from 28 countries on four continents.
METHODS: The review is based on original papers published 1900 to 1999, stepwise traced through reference lists. Inclusion criteria were: firstly, that the cases reported be consecutive, secondly the presence of an acceptable description of methodology and thirdly, the study size was set at a minimum of 25 cases for analysis of maternal and fetal mortality. Papers comprising only five to 24 cases were included in other analyses. All studies were retrospective, except the follow up studies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Maternal and fetal mortality; causes of maternal death; fetal mortality in previous deliveries; mode of delivery in subsequent pregnancies; symphyseal width after symphysiotomy; immediate, short and long term complications; maternal and fetal mortality comparing symphysiotomy and caesarean section.
RESULTS: Symphysiotomy has been extensively studied, modified and refined over the last century, and the scientific documentation is substantial. The results indicate that symphysiotomy is safe for the mother from a vital perspective, confers a permanent enlargement of the pelvis and facilitates vaginal delivery in future pregnancies, and is a life saving operation for the child. Severe complications are rare. Symphysiotomy compares favourably with caesarean section in terms of risk for the mother's life.
CONCLUSION: If valid conclusions can be drawn from one hundred years of retrospective studies, there is considerable evidence to support a reinstatement of symphysiotomy in the obstetric arsenal, for the benefit of women in obstructed labour and their offspring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11950177     DOI: 10.1016/s1470-0328(02)01214-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  8 in total

1.  Rectal foreign bodies: A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  G Kasotakis; L Roediger; S Mittal
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2011-12-08

Review 2.  Shoulder dystocia: prediction and management.

Authors:  Meghan G Hill; Wayne R Cohen
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2016-02-22

3.  Indication.

Authors:  Ronald E Pust
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Postoperative care of symphysiotomy performed for severe shoulder dystocia with fetal demise.

Authors:  Joy Anderson; R Moss Hampton; Jonathan Lugo
Journal:  Case Rep Womens Health       Date:  2017-03-07

5.  A ruptured uterus in a pregnant woman not in labor.

Authors:  Damien Punguyire; Kenneth Victor Iserson
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2011-01-19

6.  Think globally act locally: the case for symphysiotomy.

Authors:  Douwe Arie Anne Verkuyl
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  Symphysiotomy in Zimbabwe; postoperative outcome, width of the symphysis joint, and knowledge, attitudes and practice among doctors and midwives.

Authors:  Hege Langli Ersdal; Douwe A A Verkuyl; Kenneth Björklund; Staffan Bergström
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Diagnosis and management of 365 ureteric injuries following obstetric and gynecologic surgery in resource-limited settings.

Authors:  Thomas J I P Raassen; Carrie J Ngongo; Marietta M Mahendeka
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 2.894

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.