Literature DB >> 11948182

Substitutions of Phe61 located in the vicinity of template 5'-overhang influence polymerase fidelity and nucleoside analog sensitivity of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase.

Timothy S Fisher1, Vinayaka R Prasad.   

Abstract

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase (RT) is an error-prone DNA polymerase. Structural determinants of its fidelity are incompletely understood. RT/template primer contacts have been shown to influence its fidelity and sensitivity to nucleoside analog inhibitors. The Phe(61) residue, located within the beta 3 sheet of the finger subdomain, is highly conserved among retroviral RTs. The crystal structure of a ternary complex revealed that Phe(61) contacts the first and second bases of the 5'-template overhang. To determine whether such contacts influence the dNTP-binding pocket, we performed a limited vertical scanning mutagenesis (Phe --> Ala, Leu, Trp, or Tyr) at Phe(61). The F61A mutant displayed the highest increase in fidelity, followed by the F61L and F61W variants, which had intermediate phenotypes. F61Y RT had a minimal effect. The increase in fidelity of the F61A mutant was corroborated by a 12-fold decrease in its forward mutation rate. The Phe(61) mutant RTs also displayed large reductions in sensitivity to 2',3'-dideoxythymidine triphosphate and 2',3'-dideoxy,2'3'-didehydrothymidine triphosphate. Mutants displaying the largest increase in fidelity (F61A and F61L) were also the most resistant. These results suggest that contacts between the finger subdomain of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RT and the template 5'-overhang are important determinants of the geometry of the dNTP-binding pocket.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11948182     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M200282200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  18 in total

1.  K65R and K65A substitutions in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase enhance polymerase fidelity by decreasing both dNTP misinsertion and mispaired primer extension efficiencies.

Authors:  Scott J Garforth; Robert A Domaoal; Chisanga Lwatula; Mark J Landau; Amanda J Meyer; Karen S Anderson; Vinayaka R Prasad
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Probing the active site steric flexibility of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase: different constraints for DNA- versus RNA-templated synthesis.

Authors:  Adam P Silverman; Scott J Garforth; Vinayaka R Prasad; Eric T Kool
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Impact of template overhang-binding region of HIV-1 RT on the binding and orientation of the duplex region of the template-primer.

Authors:  Alok K Upadhyay; Tanaji T Talele; Virendra N Pandey
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 3.396

4.  Guanine α-carboxy nucleoside phosphonate (G-α-CNP) shows a different inhibitory kinetic profile against the DNA polymerases of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and herpes viruses.

Authors:  Jan Balzarini; Michael Menni; Kalyan Das; Lizette van Berckelaer; Alan Ford; Nuala M Maguire; Sandra Liekens; Paul E Boehmer; Eddy Arnold; Matthias Götte; Anita R Maguire
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 5.858

5.  Preferred sequences within a defined cleavage window specify DNA 3' end-directed cleavages by retroviral RNases H.

Authors:  Sharon J Schultz; Miaohua Zhang; James J Champoux
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Substitution of alanine for tyrosine-64 in the fingers subdomain of M-MuLV reverse transcriptase impairs strand displacement synthesis and blocks viral replication in vivo.

Authors:  Benjamin A Paulson; Miaohua Zhang; Sharon J Schultz; James J Champoux
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 3.616

7.  Mutations M184V and Y115F in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase discriminate against "nucleotide-competing reverse transcriptase inhibitors".

Authors:  Maryam Ehteshami; Brian J Scarth; Egor P Tchesnokov; Chandravanu Dash; Stuart F J Le Grice; Sabine Hallenberger; Dirk Jochmans; Matthias Götte
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Template-primer binding affinity and RNase H cleavage specificity contribute to the strand transfer efficiency of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase.

Authors:  Joanna Luczkowiak; Tania Matamoros; Luis Menéndez-Arias
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Human immunodeficiency virus reverse transcriptase displays dramatically higher fidelity under physiological magnesium conditions in vitro.

Authors:  Vasudevan Achuthan; Brian J Keith; Bernard A Connolly; Jeffrey J DeStefano
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Mutation rates and intrinsic fidelity of retroviral reverse transcriptases.

Authors:  Luis Menéndez-Arias
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 5.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.