Literature DB >> 11944790

The consequences of official labels: an examination of the rights lost by the mentally ill and mentally incompetent ten years later.

Craig Hemmens1, Milo Miller, Velmer S Burton, Susan Milner.   

Abstract

This study presents a survey of state statutes which restrict the civil rights of persons with a mental illness or who have been declared mentally incompetent. Five civil rights (jury service, voting, holding public office, marriage, and parenting) are examined. The results of the 1999 study are compared with the results of a 1989 study, to reveal any trends in the restriction of the civil rights of those suffering from mental problems. This comparison reveals that states continue to restrict the rights of the mentally ill and incompetent, and that there is a trend toward increased restriction of the familial rights of marriage and parenting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11944790     DOI: 10.1023/a:1014543104471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Community Ment Health J        ISSN: 0010-3853


  3 in total

1.  The rights of the mentally ill under state constitutions.

Authors:  Alan Meisel
Journal:  Law Contemp Probl       Date:  1982

2.  The consequences of official labels: a research note on rights lost by the mentally ill, mentally incompetent, and convicted felons.

Authors:  V S Burton
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  1990-06

3.  Contact with the mentally ill and perceptions of how dangerous they are.

Authors:  B G Link; F T Cullen
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1986-12
  3 in total
  10 in total

1.  The Consequences of Official Labels: An Examination of the Rights Lost by the Mentally Ill and Mentally Incompetent Since 1989.

Authors:  Andrea M Walker; Michael S Klein; Craig Hemmens; Mary K Stohr; Velmer S Burton
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2015-09-24

2.  The Invisible Children's Project: key ingredients of an intervention for parents with mental illness.

Authors:  Beth R Hinden; Kathleen Biebel; Joanne Nicholson; Liz Mehnert
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2005 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.505

3.  Rethinking theoretical approaches to stigma: a Framework Integrating Normative Influences on Stigma (FINIS).

Authors:  Bernice A Pescosolido; Jack K Martin; Annie Lang; Sigrun Olafsdottir
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Implementing a brief hallucination simulation as a mental illness stigma reduction strategy.

Authors:  Seth A Brown
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2009-08-09

5.  Preferences of the public regarding cutbacks in expenditure for patient care: are there indications of discrimination against those with mental disorders?

Authors:  Georg Schomerus; Herbert Matschinger; Matthias C Angermeyer
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 4.328

6.  The Effects of Direct-To-Consumer-Advertising on Mental Illness Beliefs and Stigma.

Authors:  Seth A Brown
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2017-03-03

7.  An examination of two brief stigma reduction strategies: filmed personal contact and hallucination simulations.

Authors:  Seth A Brown; Yolanda Evans; Kelly Espenschade; Maureen O'Connor
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2010-04-23

8.  California's historic effort to reduce the stigma of mental illness: the Mental Health Services Act.

Authors:  Wayne Clark; Stephanie N Welch; Sandra H Berry; Ann M Collentine; Rebecca Collins; Dorthy Lebron; Amy L Shearer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Human Rights, Stigma, and Substance Use.

Authors:  Jenifer Wogen; Maria Teresa Restrepo
Journal:  Health Hum Rights       Date:  2020-06

10.  Toward a policy ecology of implementation of evidence-based practices in public mental health settings.

Authors:  Ramesh Raghavan; Charlotte Lyn Bright; Amy L Shadoin
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 7.327

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.