Literature DB >> 11943528

Dose requirements and recovery profile of an infusion of cisatracurium during liver transplantation.

Guy Cammu1, Gudrun Bossuyt, Luc De Baerdemaeker, Nadia Den Blauwen, Michel Struys, Eric Mortier.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To examine the dose requirements and recovery profile of an infusion of cisatracurium during liver transplantation.
DESIGN: Open-label, descriptive study.
SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: 6 ASA physical status III and IV patients with end-stage liver disease, undergoing liver transplantation.
INTERVENTIONS: Neuromuscular transmission was monitored electromyographically. After recovery of T1/T0 to 10%, cisatracurium was infused at an initial rate of 1.5 microg/kg/min. The infusion rate was adjusted to maintain T1/T0 at 10%. At the end of surgery, spontaneous recovery from the neuromuscular block was awaited.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The infusion rate of cisatracurium was 1.6 +/- 0.4 microg/kg/min. Before the anhepatic phase, this rate was 1.5 +/- 0.4 microg/kg/min; during the anhepatic phase it was 1.7 +/- 0.5 microg/kg/min; and after reperfusion it was 1.9 +/- 0.4 microg/kg/min. There was a significant difference between the cisatracurium infusion rates before and after the anhepatic phase (p < 0.05). Following termination of the infusion, the time to 25% recovery of T1/T0 was 19.2 +/- 6.1 minutes, the recovery index (25% to 75%) was 28.8 +/- 7.0 minutes, and the time for the train-of-four (TOF) ratio to reach 0.7 was 50.2 +/- 7.1 minutes. The time for the TOF ratio to reach 0.9 was 61.4 +/- 6.6 minutes. There was no difference in body temperature or pH during the consecutive stages of transplantation.
CONCLUSIONS: The infusion dose requirement for cisatracurium during liver transplantation tended to be higher than previously reported in healthy patients; recovery appeared prolonged. In continuous infusion of cisatracurium during liver transplantation, the tendency toward higher dose requirements, the protracted duration of infusion, the non-Hofmann elimination and/or other pharmacokinetic changes during transplantation might influence recovery from the neuromuscular block. Potential temperature or pH change during surgery seemed irrelevant in explaining the delayed recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11943528     DOI: 10.1016/s0952-8180(01)00370-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  2 in total

Review 1.  Split liver transplantation: What's unique?

Authors:  Aparna R Dalal
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2015-09-24

2.  SUGAMMADEX versus neostigmine after ROCURONIUM continuous infusion in patients undergoing liver transplantation.

Authors:  Cristian Deana; Federico Barbariol; Stefano D'Incà; Livia Pompei; Giorgio Della Rocca
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 2.217

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.