Literature DB >> 11943102

[Helicobacter pylori infection and functional dyspepsia. Meta-analysis of efficacy of eradication therapy].

Javier P Gisbert1, Xavier Calvet, Rafael Gabriel, José María Pajares.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To establish a causal link between Helicobacter pylori infection and functional dyspepsia it is necessary to demonstrate that H. pylori eradication induces an improvement in dyspeptic symptoms. Our aim was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized studies comparing, in functional dyspepsia, the efficacy of H. pylori eradication treatment with that of treatments with no effect on H. pylori infection. DATA SOURCES: PubMed database, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and abstracts from congresses until 2001. SELECTION CRITERIA: a) studies including patients with functional dyspepsia and H. pylori infection; b) randomized trials comparing H. pylori eradication treatment with treatment (control) with no effect on H. pylori infection, and c) follow-up of at least 6 months. The quality of studies was assessed by a validated score. STATISTICS: the main outcome was the percentage of patients improving in each therapeutic group. A meta-analysis was performed combining the odds ratios (OR) of individual studies in a global OR.
RESULTS: Nine studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were thus included in the meta-analysis. Overall, 953 patients received an eradication treatment and 958 received a control treatment. The overall percentage of patients with symptomatic improvement in the eradication group was 43% (95% CI, 40-46%), and it was 39% (95% CI, 36-42%) in the control group. The OR for the effect of the eradication treatment vs. the control treatment was 1.20 (95% CI, 0.91-1.58). The number needed to treat (NNT) with eradication therapy to achieve a symptomatic improvement, compared with the control group, was 25. Although heterogeneity was demonstrated, it disappeared when one study showing positive, clearly discordant results was excluded. Thus, the percentage of patients with symptomatic improvement in the eradication treatment group was 47% (95% CI, 43-50%) and it was 45% (95% CI, 41-48%) in the control group (OR: 1.06; 0.85-1.31; NNT: 50).
CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori eradication treatment is not associated with a statistically significant improvement of symptoms in patients with functional dyspepsia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11943102     DOI: 10.1016/s0025-7753(02)72403-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)        ISSN: 0025-7753            Impact factor:   1.725


  5 in total

1.  [Clinical practice guideline on the management of patients with dyspepsia. Update 2012].

Authors:  Javier P Gisbert; Xavier Calvet; Juan Ferrándiz; Juan Mascort; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Mercè Marzo
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 1.137

2.  Helicobacter pylori eradication in nonulcer dyspepsia: does it really matter?

Authors:  Ahmad S AlMalki
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.485

Review 3.  Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy for functional dyspepsia: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li-Jun Du; Bin-Rui Chen; John J Kim; Sarah Kim; Jin-Hua Shen; Ning Dai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Efficacy of serotonin receptor agonists in the treatment of functional dyspepsia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Man Jin; Yali Mo; Kaisheng Ye; Mingxian Chen; Yi Liu; Cao He
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.318

5.  Comparison of clinical symptoms after Helicobacter pylori eradication in functional dyspepsia patients based on endoscopic view of antral gastropathy.

Authors:  S Azadbakht; S Azadbakht; A Esmaili; P Rahmani
Journal:  New Microbes New Infect       Date:  2020-11-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.