Literature DB >> 11942563

Treatment of depression in rural Arkansas: policy implications for improving care.

K Rost1, J Fortney, M Zhang, J Smith, G R Smith.   

Abstract

Policy-makers have long suspected that greater barriers to care result in depressed rural residents being less likely to receive high-quality treatment. This study recruited 470 depressed community residents in a 1992 telephone survey, followed 95 percent of them through one year, and abstracted additional data on their health care utilization from insurance claims, medical and pharmacy records. Bivariate and multivariate models demonstrated that during the year following the baseline, there were no significant rural-urban differences in the rate (probability of any outpatient depression treatment), type (probability of receiving general medical depression care only), or quality (completion of guideline-concordant acute-stage care) of outpatient depression treatment. Annual expenditures for outpatient depression treatment were lower for rural subjects compared with their urban counterparts. Rural subjects had 3.05 times the odds of being admitted to a hospital for physical problems and 3.06 times the odds of being admitted to a hospital for mental health problems during the year following baseline compared with urban subjects. Cost-offset analyses demonstrate that every dollar invested in depression treatment was associated with a $2.61 decrease in the cost of treating physical problems in depressed rural residents. Limited insurance coverage and limited availability of services were the most significant barriers to specialty and general medical outpatient treatment for depression in both rural and urban residents. More than 80 percent of depressed residents in both rural and urban areas visited a primary care provider during the year following baseline. The potential cost offset of depression treatment in rural populations plus the improvement in productivity observed in both rural and urban populations indicate that it may be economically possible to improve quality of care for depression without bankrupting an already strained health care budget.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 11942563     DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.1999.tb00752.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rural Health        ISSN: 0890-765X            Impact factor:   4.333


  7 in total

1.  Rural-urban differences in service use for memory-related problems in older adults.

Authors:  N R Chumbler; M Cody; B M Booth; C K Beck
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  Factors associated with perceived stigma for alcohol use and treatment among at-risk drinkers.

Authors:  John Fortney; Snigdha Mukherjee; Geoffrey Curran; Stacy Fortney; Xiaotong Han; Brenda M Booth
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2004 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.505

3.  Geriatric depression assessment by rural primary care physicians.

Authors:  Michael Glasser; Lieke Vogels; Judith Gravdal
Journal:  Rural Remote Health       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 1.759

4.  Disparities in Alcohol, Drug Use, and Mental Health Condition Prevalence and Access to Care in Rural, Isolated, and Reservation Areas: Findings From the South Dakota Health Survey.

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Margaret Spurlock; Kristen Dulacki; Thomas Meath; Hsin-Fang Grace Li; Dennis McCarty; Donald Warne; Bill Wright; K John McConnell
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Rural/urban residence, access, and perceived need for treatment among African American cocaine users.

Authors:  Tyrone F Borders; Brenda M Booth; Katharine E Stewart; Ann M Cheney; Geoffrey M Curran
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Understanding Treatment Gaps for Mental Health, Alcohol, and Drug Use in South Dakota: A Qualitative Study of Rural Perspectives.

Authors:  Lauren Broffman; Margaret Spurlock; Kristen Dulacki; Amy Campbell; Fanny Rodriguez; Bill Wright; K John McConnell; Donald Warne; Melinda M Davis
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Psychosocial health status of persons seeking treatment for exposure to libby amphibole asbestos.

Authors:  Clarann Weinert; Wade G Hill; Charlene A Winters; Sandra W Kuntz; Kimberly Rowse; Tanis Hernandez; Brad Black; Shirley Cudney
Journal:  ISRN Nurs       Date:  2011-05-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.