Literature DB >> 11941341

Therapeutic efficacy of an oral appliance in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: a 2-year follow-up.

Edmund C Rose1, Gabriele M Barthlen, Richard Staats, Irmtrud E Jonas.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term efficacy of an oral appliance, the Karwetzky activator, on respiratory and sleep parameters in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Those selected for this study were 26 patients polysomnographically diagnosed with mild-to-moderate OSA. They were initially treated successfully with this appliance, as documented by a second polysomnographic study after 6 to 12 weeks. Further polysomnographic registrations 6 to 12 months and 18 to 24 months later were performed for each patient wearing the appliance. For 21 patients (81%), therapeutic efficacy was maintained; 5 patients (19%) showed a deterioration in respiratory parameters. We corrected this by adjusting the device in 2 patients. The mean apnea-hypopnea index decreased significantly from 17.8 events per hour at the baseline registration to 4.2 events per hour (P <.001) after 6 to 12 weeks of treatment. After 6 to 12 months, the apnea-hypopnea index was 8.2 events per hour. The index remained at this level 18 to 24 months later, with 8.3 events per hour. Mean oxygen saturation was not improved with the activator, but the number of desaturations had decreased at the 6-to-12 week review. Again, the improvement declined with time, but the number of oxygen desaturations was still significantly decreased at 18 to 24 months (P <.01). Although the respiratory parameters remained statistically improved throughout the study (P <.01), sleep architecture did not change statistically. In most patients, therapeutic efficacy was maintained at the 2-year follow-up, although there was a tendency for effectiveness to fall over time. We concluded that the Karwetzky activator may be an effective treatment alternative for patients with mild-to-moderate OSA, but therapy requires diligent and regular polysomnographic follow-ups. Further long-term studies are needed to assess the continued efficacy of this oral appliance in treating OSA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11941341     DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.121006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  13 in total

1.  Oral appliance versus continuous positive airway pressure in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Michiel H J Doff; Aarnoud Hoekema; Peter J Wijkstra; Johannes H van der Hoeven; James J R Huddleston Slater; Lambert G M de Bont; Boudewijn Stegenga
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 2.  Oral appliances for obstructive sleep apnoea.

Authors:  J Lim; T J Lasserson; J Fleetham; J Wright
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-01-25

3.  Role of Oral Appliances in the Management of Sleep Disorders.

Authors:  B Jayan; Bnbm Prasad; R K Dhiman
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

4.  Long-term efficacy of an oral appliance in early treated patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Marie Marklund
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 2.816

5.  Knowledge, opinions, and clinical experience of general practice dentists toward obstructive sleep apnea and oral appliances.

Authors:  Hui Bian
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.816

6.  Long-term therapeutic efficacy of oral appliances in treatment of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome.

Authors:  Xu Gong; Jingjing Zhang; Ying Zhao; Xuemei Gao
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Factors influencing adherence to oral appliance therapy in adults with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Harishri Tallamraju; J Tim Newton; Padhraig S Fleming; Ama Johal
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.324

Review 8.  Review of oral appliances for treatment of sleep-disordered breathing.

Authors:  Victor Hoffstein
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 9.  A consideration of factors affecting palliative oral appliance effectiveness for obstructive sleep apnea: a scoping review.

Authors:  Bruce S Haskell; Michael J Voor; Andrew M Roberts
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.062

10.  Mandibular advancement device use in obstructive sleep apnea: ORCADES study 5-year follow-up data.

Authors:  Marie-Françoise Vecchierini; Valérie Attali; Jean-Marc Collet; Marie-Pia d'Ortho; Frederic Goutorbe; Jean-Baptiste Kerbrat; Damien Leger; Florent Lavergne; Christelle Monaca; Pierre-Jean Monteyrol; Eric Mullens; Bernard Pigearias; Francis Martin; Hauria Khemliche; Lionel Lerousseau; Jean-Claude Meurice
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 4.324

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.