Literature DB >> 11940462

Summary of the National Toxicology Program's report of the endocrine disruptors low-dose peer review.

Ronald Melnick1, George Lucier, Mary Wolfe, Roxanne Hall, George Stancel, Gail Prins, Michael Gallo, Kenneth Reuhl, Shuk-Mei Ho, Terry Brown, John Moore, Julian Leakey, Joseph Haseman, Michael Kohn.   

Abstract

At the request of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), the National Toxicology Program organized an independent and open peer review to evaluate the scientific evidence on low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose-response relationships for endocrine-disrupting chemicals in mammalian species. For this peer review, "low-dose effects" referred to biologic changes that occur in the range of human exposures or at doses lower than those typically used in the standard testing paradigm of the U.S. EPA for evaluating reproductive and developmental toxicity. The demonstration that an effect is adverse was not required because in many cases the long-term health consequences of altered endocrine function during development have not been fully characterized. A unique aspect of this peer review was the willing submission of individual animal data by principal investigators of primary research groups active in this field and the independent statistical reanalyses of selected parameters prior to the peer review meeting by a subpanel of statisticians. The expert peer-review panel (the panel) also considered mechanistic data that might influence the plausibility of low-dose effects and identified study design issues or other biologic factors that might account for differences in reported outcomes among studies. The panel found that low-dose effects, as defined for this review, have been demonstrated in laboratory animals exposed to certain endocrine-active agents. In some cases where low-dose effects have been reported, the findings have not been replicated. The shape of the dose-response curves for reported effects varied with the end point and dosing regimen and were low-dose linear, threshold-appearing, or nonmonotonic. The findings of the panel indicate that the current testing paradigm used for assessments of reproductive and developmental toxicity should be revisited to see whether changes are needed regarding dose selection, animal-model selection, age when animals are evaluated, and the end points being measured following exposure to endocrine-active agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11940462      PMCID: PMC1240807          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.02110427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  1 in total

1.  Statistical issues in the analysis of low-dose endocrine disruptor data.

Authors:  J K Haseman; A J Bailer; R L Kodell; R Morris; K Portier
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.849

  1 in total
  63 in total

1.  Bisphenol A increases mammary cancer risk in two distinct mouse models of breast cancer.

Authors:  Kristen Weber Lozada; Ruth A Keri
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 2.  Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Theo Colborn; Tyrone B Hayes; Jerrold J Heindel; David R Jacobs; Duk-Hee Lee; Toshi Shioda; Ana M Soto; Frederick S vom Saal; Wade V Welshons; R Thomas Zoeller; John Peterson Myers
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 19.871

3.  Bisphenol A (BPA) stimulates the interferon signaling and activates the inflammasome activity in myeloid cells.

Authors:  Ravichandran Panchanathan; Hongzhu Liu; Yuet-Kin Leung; Shuk-mei Ho; Divaker Choubey
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 4.102

4.  Mouse strain does not influence the overall effects of bisphenol a-induced toxicity in adult antral follicles.

Authors:  Jackye Peretz; Steven L Neese; Jodi A Flaws
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.285

5.  Associations between endocrine disrupting chemicals and equine metabolic syndrome phenotypes.

Authors:  S A Durward-Akhurst; N E Schultz; E M Norton; A K Rendahl; H Besselink; P A Behnisch; A Brouwer; R J Geor; J R Mickelson; M E McCue
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 6.  Incorporating salivary biomarkers into nursing research: an overview and review of best practices.

Authors:  Douglas A Granger; Sara B Johnson; Sarah L Szanton; Dorothée Out; Lynette Lau Schumann
Journal:  Biol Res Nurs       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 2.522

Review 7.  Developmental estrogen exposures predispose to prostate carcinogenesis with aging.

Authors:  Gail S Prins; Lynn Birch; Wan-Yee Tang; Shuk-Mei Ho
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 3.143

8.  Investigation of the effects of subchronic low dose oral exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) and ethinyl estradiol (EE) on estrogen receptor expression in the juvenile and adult female rat hypothalamus.

Authors:  Meghan E Rebuli; Jinyan Cao; Emily Sluzas; K Barry Delclos; Luísa Camacho; Sherry M Lewis; Michelle M Vanlandingham; Heather B Patisaul
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 9.  Bisphenol-A and the great divide: a review of controversies in the field of endocrine disruption.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Maricel V Maffini; Carlos Sonnenschein; Beverly S Rubin; Ana M Soto
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 10.  How subchronic and chronic health effects can be neglected for GMOs, pesticides or chemicals.

Authors:  Gilles-Eric Séralini; Joël Spiroux de Vendômois; Dominique Cellier; Charles Sultan; Marcello Buiatti; Lou Gallagher; Michael Antoniou; Krishna R Dronamraju
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 6.580

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.