Literature DB >> 11940136

Comparison of the bleeding on marginal probing index and the Eastman interdental bleeding index as indicators of gingivitis.

D S Barendregt1, M F Timmerman, U van der Velden, G A van der Weijden.   

Abstract

AIM: The purpose of the present study was to compare 2 indices, i.e., the Eastman interdental bleeding (EIB) index and the bleeding on marginal probing (BOMP) index. The comparison was made (a) in terms of the degree of bleeding provoked and the relationship with plaque in natural gingivitis and (b) for the ability of these 2 methods to detect differences between the development of experimental gingivitis in a control group and a group in which the development of gingival inflammation was suppressed by treatment. For the present studies, subjects were selected without interdental recession of the gingival tissues. METHODS EXPERIMENT 1: In this experiment, 43 subjects having established moderate gingivitis were assessed using a random splitmouth design (1st and 3rd/2nd and 4th quadrant). Plaque was scored on all approximal sites after which the BOMP index was assessed in one half of the mouth and the EIB index in the other. RESULTS EXPERIMENT 1: The BOMP index showed a bleeding score of 84% and the EIB index of 87%. The significant correlation between plaque and gingival bleeding for the BOMP index (0.55) was higher than for the EIB index (0.44). METHODS EXPERIMENT 2: For this experiment, 25 subjects participated in an experimental gingivitis trial of the lower jaw. At baseline, first the BOMP index and immediately thereafter the EIB index were assessed at all approximal sites. Experimental gingivitis (EG) was carried out in one randomly assigned quadrant and as a treatment modality only floss was used in the other (FL). RESULTS EXPERIMENT 2: In the EG quadrant, the BOMP index increased to 69% and the EIB index to 73%. Both indices showed a significant correlation with plaque; 0.60 and 0.64 respectively. In the FL quadrant, the BOMP index increased to 38% and the EIB index to 30%. No significant correlation between both gingivitis indices and the amount of plaque was present in the FL quadrant.
CONCLUSION: The ability of the BOMP index and the EIB index to assess the level gingival inflammation appears to be comparable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11940136     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.290302.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  3 in total

1.  In Defense of Flossing: Part II-Can We Agree It's Premature to Claim Flossing Is Ineffective to Help Prevent Periodontal Diseases?

Authors:  Lance T Vernon; Andre Paes B Da Silva; Jason D Seacat
Journal:  J Evid Based Dent Pract       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 5.267

2.  The Bleeding on Brushing Index: a novel index in preventive dentistry.

Authors:  Tobias Rosenauer; Constanze Wagenschwanz; Matthias Kuhn; Anna Kensche; Sandra Stiehl; Christian Hannig
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.607

3.  Defining the healthy "core microbiome" of oral microbial communities.

Authors:  Egija Zaura; Bart J F Keijser; Susan M Huse; Wim Crielaard
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 3.605

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.