Literature DB >> 11939378

Variation in coronary artery bypass grafting, angioplasty, cataract surgery, and hip replacement rates among primary care groups in London: association with population and practice characteristics.

Azeem Majeed1, Joseph Eliahoo, Martin Bardsley, David Morgan, Andrew B Bindman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Operation rates for common surgical procedures are known to vary widely both between areas within the same country and between countries. However, no studies in the United Kingdom have yet examined the variation in the use of important groups of surgical procedures among primary care groups.
METHODS: Data were obtained from the NHS Executive and the Department of Health on each of the 66 primary care groups in London that existed on 1 April 1999. These were used to estimate indicators for six main groups of variables: population estimates, mortality rates, Census data, benefits data, practice characteristics, and hospital admissions. The data were used to generate a number of population and practice variables describing the characteristics of each primary care group in London. We also obtained information at ward level by age and sex on the number of patients admitted for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and angioplasty (PTCA); cataract surgery; and hip replacement in patients aged 65 years and over during the period 1997-1998. These data were used with population estimates to estimate directly age-standardized annual operation rates for each primary care group for the study period.
RESULTS: Operation rates for the three groups of procedures examined in this study varied widely between the 66 primary care groups. The directly standardized combined CABG and PtCA rate varied from 28 to 193 per 100,000 (mean 80); cataract surgery rates from 167 to 618 per 100,000 (mean 291); and hip replacement in people aged 65 years and over from 74 to 363 per 100,000 (mean 202). Correlations between operation rates and population and practice variables were relatively weak. Multifactorial models explained 57 per cent of the variation in CABG and PTCA rates, 34 per cent of the variation in cataract surgery rates, and 27 per cent of the variation in hip replacement rates.
CONCLUSIONS: There are wide variations in the operation rates for important groups of surgical procedures among primary care groups. These variations are poorly explained by differences in the population and practice characteristics of primary care groups. The underlying reasons for variations in operation rates need to be better understood if the ambitious targets for access to elective surgery outlined in the NHS plan are to be met.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11939378     DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/24.1.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Med        ISSN: 0957-4832


  12 in total

1.  Indications for total hip replacement: comparison of assessments of orthopaedic surgeons and referring physicians.

Authors:  K E Dreinhöfer; P Dieppe; T Stürmer; D Gröber-Grätz; M Flören; K-P Günther; W Puhl; H Brenner
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  Drivers of surgery for the degenerative hip, knee, and spine: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Samuel Bederman; Charles D Rosen; Nitin N Bhatia; P Douglas Kiester; Ranjan Gupta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Are GP practice prescribing rates for coronary heart disease drugs equitable? A cross sectional analysis in four primary care trusts in England.

Authors:  P R Ward; P R Noyce; A S St Leger
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Practice characteristics and prescribing of cardiovascular drugs in areas with higher risk of CHD in Scotland: cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Gary McLean
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2008-07-15

5.  Cross-sectional analysis of association between socioeconomic status and utilization of primary total hip joint replacements 2006-7: Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

Authors:  Sharon L Brennan; Tyman Stanford; Anita E Wluka; Margaret J Henry; Richard S Page; Stephen E Graves; Mark A Kotowicz; Geoffrey C Nicholson; Julie A Pasco
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Cost-utility of routine cataract surgery.

Authors:  Pirjo Räsänen; Kari Krootila; Harri Sintonen; Tiina Leivo; Anna-Maija Koivisto; Olli-Pekka Ryynänen; Marja Blom; Risto P Roine
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  Time-trend and variations in the proportion of second-eye cataract surgery.

Authors:  Lorena Hoffmeister; Rubén Román; Mercè Comas; Francesc Cots; Enrique Bernal-Delgado; Xavier Castells
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Socio-economic position has no effect on improvement in health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction in total hip and knee replacement: a cohort study.

Authors:  J Christiaan Keurentjes; David Blane; Melanie Bartley; Johan J B Keurentjes; Marta Fiocco; Rob G Nelissen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Utilisation of primary total knee joint replacements across socioeconomic status in the Barwon Statistical Division, Australia, 2006-2007: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sharon Lee Brennan; Tyman Stanford; Anita E Wluka; Richard S Page; Stephen E Graves; Mark A Kotowicz; Geoffrey C Nicholson; Julie A Pasco
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Inequities in access to healthcare: analysis of national survey data across six Asia-Pacific countries.

Authors:  Samantha B Meyer; Tini C N Luong; Loreen Mamerow; Paul R Ward
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.