Literature DB >> 11938619

Technology and patient safety: a two-edged sword.

James B Battles1, Margaret A Keyes.   

Abstract

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) is now the world's largest funder of patient safety research. Part of AHRQ's research focus is to examine evidence to help determine which technologies can be used to effectively minimize harm and improve patient safety. The report of the Institute of Medicine (IOM). To Err is Human stressed the importance of automating repetitive, time-consuming, and error-prone tasks through the use of technology. While automation holds substantial promise for improved safety, error experts caution that all technology introduces the potential for new and different errors. It is critical that any new automated system be tested in actual operational settings to determine what, if any, unanticipated failures exist. Field-based research is essential in the emerging field of patient safety to create the evidence as to which technologies actually improve patient safety and those that may well increase the potential for harm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11938619     DOI: 10.2345/0899-8205(2002)36[84:TAPSAT]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Instrum Technol        ISSN: 0899-8205


  9 in total

1.  In Reply.

Authors:  Karen C Nanji; David W Bates
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Quality and safety by design.

Authors:  J B Battles
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-12

3.  Full implementation of computerized physician order entry and medication-related quality outcomes: a study of 3364 hospitals.

Authors:  Feliciano B Yu; Nir Menachemi; Eta S Berner; Jeroan J Allison; Norman W Weissman; Thomas K Houston
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Nurses' acceptance of Smart IV pump technology.

Authors:  Pascale Carayon; Ann Schoofs Hundt; Tosha B Wetterneck
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 4.046

5.  Patient safety - the role of human factors and systems engineering.

Authors:  Pascale Carayon; Kenneth E Wood
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2010

Review 6.  Medical errors and clinical risk management: state of the art.

Authors:  L La Pietra; L Calligaris; L Molendini; R Quattrin; S Brusaferro
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.124

Review 7.  Patient safety risks associated with telecare: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the literature.

Authors:  Veslemøy Guise; Janet Anderson; Siri Wiig
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Effectiveness of the advisory display SmartPilot® view in the assessment of anesthetic depth in low risk gynecological surgery patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hilde Strand; Ann Charlott Elshaug; Øyvind Bernersen; Randi Ballangrud
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 9.  Human factors and ergonomics as a patient safety practice.

Authors:  Pascale Carayon; Anping Xie; Sarah Kianfar
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 7.035

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.