BACKGROUND: The therapeutic gain of surgery for recurrent rectal cancer is not clear, particularly with regard to the addition of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT). METHODS: Patients (107) with isolated pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer received preoperative external radiotherapy of 46-50 in 2 Gy fractions. At surgery 59 patients had IORT 12-18 Gy. Survival and local recurrence was analysed with regard to surgical resection stages and IORT. RESULTS: Patients (44) had R0- and 39 R1-resections, 24 R2-resections or exploratory laparotomy. IORT was given most often after R1-resections, least in R0-patients. Estimated 5-year survival was overall around 30%, around 60% in the R0-, around 25% for R1- and 0% in R2-patients. Local recurrence was around 30% in the R0- and around 65% in R1-stage patients. R0-/R1-stage patients survived statistically significantly longer than the R2-group otherwise there was no statistical significant difference between IORT and non-IORT groups in any R-stages regarding overall survival or local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Macroscopic removal of the recurrence improves survival. Whether R0- is better than R1-resections is not clear. The effect of IORT is not a major one. IORT need be evaluated in randomised controlled trials.
BACKGROUND: The therapeutic gain of surgery for recurrent rectal cancer is not clear, particularly with regard to the addition of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT). METHODS:Patients (107) with isolated pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer received preoperative external radiotherapy of 46-50 in 2 Gy fractions. At surgery 59 patients had IORT 12-18 Gy. Survival and local recurrence was analysed with regard to surgical resection stages and IORT. RESULTS:Patients (44) had R0- and 39 R1-resections, 24 R2-resections or exploratory laparotomy. IORT was given most often after R1-resections, least in R0-patients. Estimated 5-year survival was overall around 30%, around 60% in the R0-, around 25% for R1- and 0% in R2-patients. Local recurrence was around 30% in the R0- and around 65% in R1-stage patients. R0-/R1-stage patients survived statistically significantly longer than the R2-group otherwise there was no statistical significant difference between IORT and non-IORT groups in any R-stages regarding overall survival or local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Macroscopic removal of the recurrence improves survival. Whether R0- is better than R1-resections is not clear. The effect of IORT is not a major one. IORT need be evaluated in randomised controlled trials.
Authors: Amar U Kishan; Justin C Voog; Jonathan Wiseman; Ryan R Cook; Marek Ancukiewicz; Percy Lee; David P Ryan; Jeffrey W Clark; David L Berger; James C Cusack; Jennifer Y Wo; Theodore S Hong Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2017-06-14 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Stephanie Terezakis; Lisa Morikawa; Abraham Wu; Zhigang Zhang; Weiji Shi; Martin R Weiser; Philip B Paty; Jose Guillem; Larissa Temple; Garrett M Nash; Michael J Zelefsky; Karyn A Goodman Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Dieter Hahnloser; Heidi Nelson; Leonard L Gunderson; Imran Hassan; Michael G Haddock; Michael J O'Connell; Stephen Cha; Daniel J Sargent; Alan Horgan Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Reza Mirnezami; George J Chang; Prajnan Das; Kandiah Chandrakumaran; Paris Tekkis; Ara Darzi; Alexander H Mirnezami Journal: Surg Oncol Date: 2012-12-25 Impact factor: 3.279
Authors: F Selvaggi; C Fucini; G Pellino; G Sciaudone; I Maretto; I Mondi; N Bartolini; F Caminati; S Pucciarelli Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2014-11-11 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: M Caricato; D Borzomati; F Ausania; G Tonini; C Rabitti; S Valeri; L Trodella; V Ripetti; R Coppola Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2006-05-15 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Susan Guo; Chandana A Reddy; Matthew Kolar; Neil Woody; Arul Mahadevan; F Christopher Deibel; David W Dietz; Feza H Remzi; John H Suh Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2012-07-20 Impact factor: 3.481