Literature DB >> 11937235

Risk factors for stillbirths in two swine farms in the south of Brazil.

Thomaz Lucia1, Marcio N Corrêa, João C Deschamps, Ivan Bianchi, Mauro A Donin, Ana C Machado, Werner Meincke, Jairo E M Matheus.   

Abstract

We evaluated stillbirth risk factors in two commercial swine farms of the Rio Grande do Sul State (south of Brazil). The study was conducted during 1 month in Farm A and during 2 months in Farm B, both during 1999. Data for all farrowings that occurred during the study period were recorded (101 for Farm A and 373 for Farm B), without interference in the farm management. In Farm A, 39% of all litters born during the period of interest had stillborn piglets and the stillborn risk for piglets was 12%. In Farm B, 25% of all litters had stillborn piglets whereas the stillborn risk was 2%. Variables considered as potential risk factors for stillbirths were: parity (1, 2-3, 4+); breed (purebred or crossbred); sow body-condition (normal or fat); use of oxytocin during parturition (yes or no); obstetric intervention through vaginal palpation (yes or no); farrowing duration (<4 or > or =4h); mummified fetuses (yes or no); total litter size (<12 or > or =12 piglets); and litter birth weight (<11 or > or =11kg). All stillborn piglets had their classification validated by necropsy. In multivariable logistic-regressions, the cases were the litters having at least one stillborn piglet. In Farm A, litters having at least 12 pigs and in which oxytocin was used during the parturition had 20.8-times-higher odds of stillborn occurrence. In Farm B, litters from sows having parity > or =4 had 2.2-times-higher odds of stillborn occurrence than litters from parity 2 to 3 females, litters having > or =12 pigs had 2.0-times-higher odds of a stillborn piglet than smaller litters and farrowings in which vaginal palpation was performed had 8.0-times-higher odds. Farrowing room management to minimize stillborn risk should target higher-parity females, large litters and optimization of practices of obstetric interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11937235     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5877(01)00288-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  6 in total

1.  Effect of daily fluctuations in ambient temperature on reproductive failure traits of Landrace and Yorkshire sows under Thai tropical environmental conditions.

Authors:  Teerapong Jaichansukkit; Thanathip Suwanasopee; Skorn Koonawootrittriron; Padet Tummaruk; Mauricio A Elzo
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Early Blood Analysis and Gas Exchange Monitoring in the Canine Neonate: Effect of Dam's Size and Birth Order.

Authors:  Brenda Reyes-Sotelo; Asahi Ogi; Patricia Mora-Medina; Chiara Mariti; Adriana Olmos-Hernández; Ismael Hernández-Ávalos; Adriana Domínguez-Oliva; Marcelino Evodio Rosas; Antonio Verduzco-Mendoza; Angelo Gazzano
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.231

Review 3.  Management and Feeding Strategies in Early Life to Increase Piglet Performance and Welfare around Weaning: A Review.

Authors:  Laia Blavi; David Solà-Oriol; Pol Llonch; Sergi López-Vergé; Susana María Martín-Orúe; José Francisco Pérez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  High stillbirth rate in a swine farm in Vietnam and associated risk factors.

Authors:  Do Thi Kim Lanh; Nguyen Hoai Nam
Journal:  J Adv Vet Anim Res       Date:  2022-01-14

5.  Risk factors associated with the occurrence of the second-litter syndrome in sows in southeastern Mexico.

Authors:  José C Segura Correa; Alejandro Alzina-López; Ronald H Santos-Ricalde
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-10-29

6.  Viral DNA genomes in sera of farrowing sows with or without stillbirths.

Authors:  Caroline Tochetto; Ana Paula Muterle Varela; Diane Alves de Lima; Márcia Regina Loiko; Camila Mengue Scheffer; Willian Pinto Paim; Cristine Cerva; Candice Schmidt; Samuel Paulo Cibulski; Lucía Cano Ortiz; Sidia Maria Callegari Jacques; Ana Cláudia Franco; Fabiana Quoos Mayer; Paulo Michel Roehe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.