Literature DB >> 11936395

Midfacial morphology in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated by different surgical protocols.

G Swennen1, J L Berten, H Schliephake, C Treutlein, R Dempf, C Malevez, Mey A De.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare cranio-facial, particularly midfacial morphology, in two groups of children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) treated at two different cleft centres (Hannover. Germany and Brussels, Belgium) following different surgical treatment protocols. A total of 62 children (40 males; 22 females) with non-syndromic UCLP were included in this study at approximately the age of 10. The Hannover group comprised 36 children, who had repair of the lip at a mean age of 5.83 +/- 1.16 months, followed by repair of the hard and soft palate at a mean age of 29.08 +/- 4.68 and 32.25 +/- 4.29 months. respectively. The Brussels group consisted of 26 children who underwent surgical treatment according to the Malek protocol: the soft palate was closed at a mean age of 3.04 +/- 0.20 months, followed by simultaneous repair of the lip and hard palate at a mean age of 6.15 +/- 0.68 months. Midfacial morphology was evaluated by means of cephalometric analysis according to Ross. The children in the Hannover UCLP group did not differ significantly from those in the Brussels group in the anteroposterior dimension of the midface. However, the maxillary plane was significantly more open in the Brussels group due to less posterior vertical maxillary development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11936395     DOI: 10.1054/ijom.2001.0177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  5 in total

1.  Effect of dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil on preventing emergence agitation in children receiving sevoflurane anesthesia for cleft palate repair surgery.

Authors:  Ke Luo; Jun-Mei Xu; Lin Cao; Ju Gao
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Repair of cleft lip and simultaneous repair of cleft hard palate with vomer flap in unilateral complete cleft lip and palate: a comparative study.

Authors:  Kazi Md Noor-ul Ferdous; A J M Salek; M Kabirul Islam; Bijiy Krishna Das; A R Khan; Md Shahid Karim
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Marked Variation Exists Among Surgeons and Hospitals in the Use of Secondary Cleft Lip Surgery.

Authors:  Thomas J Sitzman; Adam C Carle; Jaclyn N Lundberg; Pamela C Heaton; Michael A Helmrath; Carroll-Ann Trotman; Maria T Britto
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2019-10-09

Review 4.  Role of obturators and other feeding interventions in patients with cleft lip and palate: a review.

Authors:  M Goyal; R Chopra; K Bansal; M Marwaha
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2014-01-15

5.  Contribution of FGFR1 Variants to Craniofacial Variations in East Asians.

Authors:  Mohamed Adel; Tetsutaro Yamaguchi; Daisuke Tomita; Takatoshi Nakawaki; Yong-Il Kim; Yu Hikita; Shugo Haga; Masahiro Takahashi; Mohamed A Nadim; Akira Kawaguchi; Mutsumi Isa; Walid H El-Kenany; Abbadi A El-Kadi; Soo-Byung Park; Hajime Ishida; Koutaro Maki; Ryosuke Kimura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.