Literature DB >> 11935489

[Does hospital structure influence the outcome of operative treatment of femoral neck fractures?].

R Smektala1, S Paech, M Wenning, K Hupe, A Ekkernkamp.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Data on 32 007 patients suffering from a medial fracture of the femoral neck have been collected between 1993 and 1999 in a database for external quality assurance organized by the chamber of physicians in Westfalia-Lippe. A statistical analysis (ANOVA, chi-square-test) has been performed to find out whether factors like specialization, annual volume or level of the hospital (primary, secondary or tertiary hospital) influence the outcome.
RESULTS: Patients with higher preoperative risk-factors are treated more often in primary hospitals. These clinics perform conservative treatment significantly more often than tertiary hospitals (6.5 % vs. 3.8 %). Osteosyntheses are performed more often in departments specialized in traumatology (13 %) or tertiary hospitals (16.8 %). Preoperative length of stay was 0.5-0.7 days shorter in these hospitals. There is no significant difference in postoperative complications all together (23.2-25.6 %), but a significantly lower rate in postoperative complications after osteosynthesis performed by departments specialized in traumatology (11.3 % vs. 18.8 %). A volume load of more than 50 cases per year correlates with a significant decline in postoperative complications (22.5 % vs. 28.2 %). Risk adjusted mortality does not show significant differences among the different levels of hospitals.
CONCLUSIONS: There are distinct differences regarding the way of treatment and procedural quality, but not concerning the short-term outcome between hospitals of different levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11935489     DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-24247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zentralbl Chir        ISSN: 0044-409X            Impact factor:   0.942


  5 in total

1.  [Influence of operation time point on the frequency of early complications after surgical femoral neck fracture treatment].

Authors:  C Müller-Mai; U Schulze-Raestrup; A Ekkernkamp; R Smektala
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Cost-effectiveness of referrals to high-volume hospitals: an analysis based on a probabilistic Markov model for hip fracture surgeries.

Authors:  Afschin Gandjour; Eva-Julia Weyler
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2006-11

3.  [On the prognosis of hip fractures. Assessment of mortality after hip fractures by analyzing overlapping segments of longitudinal data].

Authors:  R Smektala; C Ohmann; S Paech; E Neuhaus; M Rieger; W Schwabe; P Debold; A Deimling; M Jonas; K Hupe; H J Bücker-Nott; G Giani; T D Szucs; L Pientka
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  [Medial femoral neck fractures: possible reasons for delayed surgery. Part 2: Results of data from external inpatient quality assurance within the framework of secondary data evaluation].

Authors:  R Smektala; W Schleiz; B Fischer; F Bonnaire; U Schulze-Raestrup; H Siebert; O Boy; J Kötting
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Modeling the volume-effectiveness relationship in the case of hip fracture treatment in Finland.

Authors:  Reijo Sund
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.