OBJECTIVES: To obtain knowledge on male reproductive toxicity of inorganic lead at current European exposure levels and to establish lowest adverse effect levels, if any. METHODS: A cross sectional survey of the semen of 503 men employed by 10 companies was conducted in the United Kingdom, Italy, and Belgium. The mean blood lead concentration was 31.0 microg/dl (range 4.6-64.5) in 362 workers exposed to lead and 4.4 microg/dl (range below the detection limit of 19.8) in 141 reference workers. Semen volume and sperm concentration were determined in a fresh semen sample according to an agreed protocol subject to quality assurance. The sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) was performed at a centralised laboratory. Extraneous determinants including centre, period of sexual abstinence, and age were taken into account in the statistical analysis. If appropriate, possible thresholds were examined by iterative threshold slope linear regression. RESULTS: The median sperm concentration was reduced by 49% in men with blood lead concentration above 50 microg/dl. There was no indication of a linear trend of lower sperm concentration with increasing blood lead values, but threshold slope least square regression identified a blood lead concentration of 44 microg/dl (beta=-0.037, F=4.35, p=0.038) as a likely threshold. Abnormal sperm chromatin structure was not related to blood lead concentration, but some indications of deterioration of sperm chromatin was found in men with the highest concentrations of lead within spermatozoa. Biological monitoring data did not indicate long term effects of lead on semen quantity or sperm chromatin. CONCLUSION: Adverse effects of lead on sperm concentration and susceptibility to acid induced denaturation of sperm chromatin are unlikely at blood lead concentrations below 45 microg/dl. Effects of low level exposure to lead on other measures of testicular function cannot be ruled out.
OBJECTIVES: To obtain knowledge on male reproductive toxicity of inorganic lead at current European exposure levels and to establish lowest adverse effect levels, if any. METHODS: A cross sectional survey of the semen of 503 men employed by 10 companies was conducted in the United Kingdom, Italy, and Belgium. The mean blood lead concentration was 31.0 microg/dl (range 4.6-64.5) in 362 workers exposed to lead and 4.4 microg/dl (range below the detection limit of 19.8) in 141 reference workers. Semen volume and sperm concentration were determined in a fresh semen sample according to an agreed protocol subject to quality assurance. The sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) was performed at a centralised laboratory. Extraneous determinants including centre, period of sexual abstinence, and age were taken into account in the statistical analysis. If appropriate, possible thresholds were examined by iterative threshold slope linear regression. RESULTS: The median sperm concentration was reduced by 49% in men with blood lead concentration above 50 microg/dl. There was no indication of a linear trend of lower sperm concentration with increasing blood lead values, but threshold slope least square regression identified a blood lead concentration of 44 microg/dl (beta=-0.037, F=4.35, p=0.038) as a likely threshold. Abnormal sperm chromatin structure was not related to blood lead concentration, but some indications of deterioration of sperm chromatin was found in men with the highest concentrations of lead within spermatozoa. Biological monitoring data did not indicate long term effects of lead on semen quantity or sperm chromatin. CONCLUSION: Adverse effects of lead on sperm concentration and susceptibility to acid induced denaturation of sperm chromatin are unlikely at blood lead concentrations below 45 microg/dl. Effects of low level exposure to lead on other measures of testicular function cannot be ruled out.
Authors: J P Bonde; M Joffe; G Danscher; P Apostoli; L Bisanti; A Giwercman; H A Kolstad; P Thonneau; N Roeleveld; M Vanhoorne Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 1999 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: W J Moorman; S R Skaggs; J C Clark; T W Turner; D D Sharpnack; J A Murrell; S D Simon; R E Chapin; S M Schrader Journal: Reprod Toxicol Date: 1998 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.143
Authors: J P Bonde; E Ernst; T K Jensen; N H Hjollund; H Kolstad; T B Henriksen; T Scheike; A Giwercman; J Olsen; N E Skakkebaek Journal: Lancet Date: 1998-10-10 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: M Joffe; L Bisanti; P Apostoli; P Kiss; A Dale; N Roeleveld; M-L Lindbohm; M Sallmén; M Vanhoorne; J P Bonde Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Andrew Taylor; Jurgen Angerer; Josiane Arnaud; Françoise Claeys; Jesper Kristiansen; Olav Mazarrasa; Antonio Menditto; Marina Patriarca; Alain Pineau; Sinikka Valkonen; Cas Weykamp Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2006-06-03 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Esther García-Esquinas; Nuria Aragonés; Mario Antonio Fernández; José Miguel García-Sagredo; América de León; Concha de Paz; Ana María Pérez-Meixeira; Elisa Gil; Andrés Iriso; Margot Cisneros; Amparo de Santos; Juan Carlos Sanz; José Frutos García; Ángel Asensio; Jesús Vioque; Gonzalo López-Abente; Jenaro Astray; Marina Pollán; Mercedes Martínez; María José González; Beatriz Pérez-Gómez Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2014-03-21 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Niraj Pant; G Kumar; A D Upadhyay; D K Patel; Y K Gupta; P K Chaturvedi Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2014-05-11 Impact factor: 4.223