Literature DB >> 11934724

Expiratory asynchrony in proportional assist ventilation.

Hong-Lin Du1, Mikiya Ohtsuji, Masaki Shigeta, David C Chao, Katsunori Sasaki, Yutaka Usuda, Yoshitsugu Yamada.   

Abstract

One of the proposed advantages of proportional assist ventilation (PAV) has been the automatic synchrony between the end of the patient's inspiratory effort and the ventilator cycle (i.e., expiratory synchrony). However, recent clinical studies have shown a prolonged ventilator inspiratory time or even a "runaway" phenomenon with the normal use of PAV. We hypothesize that control-system delay may account for this, because in reality there is always some degree of delays between control-system's input and output in all ventilators. Computer simulation study to date has not taken into account the potential effect of control-system delay on expiratory synchrony. We therefore created a computer model in which the parameter of control-system delay time was introduced. We found that significant expiratory asynchrony may occur with this more realistic model of PAV. The ventilator flow termination may fall behind the completion of the patient inspiration by as long as 0.33 seconds under the selected simulation conditions. The inspiratory termination delay time is in proportion to the control-system delay time, the respiratory time constant, and the assist gain settings. In conclusion, this model indicates that due to the unavoidable control-system delay in the ventilators, expiratory asynchrony may be an inherent shortcoming associated with PAV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11934724     DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.165.7.2103049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  4 in total

1.  A physiologic comparison of proportional assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors (PAV+) versus pressure support ventilation (PSV).

Authors:  R Costa; G Spinazzola; F Cipriani; G Ferrone; O Festa; A Arcangeli; M Antonelli; R Proietti; G Conti
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Bedside waveforms interpretation as a tool to identify patient-ventilator asynchronies.

Authors:  Dimitris Georgopoulos; George Prinianakis; Eumorfia Kondili
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Clinical review: patient-ventilator interaction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Philippe Jolliet; Didier Tassaux
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 4.  Newer nonconventional modes of mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Preet Mohinder Singh; Anuradha Borle; Anjan Trikha
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2014-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.