Literature DB >> 11934144

Chemotherapeutic treatment for spinal tuberculosis.

J H van Loenhout-Rooyackers1, A L M Verbeek, P C Jutte.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate whether 6 months of chemotherapy for patients with spinal tuberculosis prevents relapse as effectively as more than 6 months of chemotherapy.
METHOD: Literature review. Medline search including references, from January 1978 to November 2000. Inclusion criteria for publications: diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis confirmed bacteriologically and/or histologically, or probable on the basis of clinical and radiological parameters; treatment regimen (whether or not in combination with surgery) included isoniazid (H), rifampicin (R) and pyrazinamide (Z); follow-up period after completion of treatment of 12 months or more. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: patients with relapse who had previously been treated adequately for tuberculosis. OUTCOME PARAMETERS: Relapse rate.
RESULTS: Four publications were found with HRZ regimens of 6 months' duration and 10 publications with HRZ regimens of >6 months' duration. A number of patients had received HRE (E = ethambutol) for > or = 9 months. In the results, no distinction was made between treatment groups. HRZ for 6 months led to a relapse rate of 0% (0/56, 95%CI 0.0-6.4); follow-up after surgical intervention ranged from 6 to 108 months. HRZ for > or = 9 months (> or = 119 patients) or HRE for > or = 9 months (< or = 71 patients) led to a relapse rate of 2% (4/218, 95%CI 0.6-5.0); follow-up after surgical intervention was 6-168 months. Despite the small number of studies, 6 months of therapy is probably sufficient for patients with spinal tuberculosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11934144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis        ISSN: 1027-3719            Impact factor:   2.373


  6 in total

1.  Current difficulties in the diagnosis and management of spinal tuberculosis.

Authors:  L Cormican; R Hammal; J Messenger; H J Milburn
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  In vitro comparison of three rifampicin loading methods in a reinforced porous β-tricalcium phosphate scaffold.

Authors:  Junjie Yuan; Baoxin Wang; Chen Han; Xiao Lu; Wei Sun; Dezhi Wang; Jianxi Lu; Jie Zhao; Chao Zhang; Youzhuan Xie
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  Spinal tuberculosis: a review.

Authors:  Ravindra Kumar Garg; Dilip Singh Somvanshi
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Evaluation of prognostic factors in medically treated patients of spinal tuberculosis.

Authors:  Ravindra Kumar Garg; Tushar Raut; Hardeep Singh Malhotra; Anit Parihar; Madhumati Goel; Amita Jain; Rajesh Verma; Maneesh Kumar Singh
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 2.631

5.  Isoniazid could be used for antibiotic-loaded bone cement for musculoskeletal tuberculosis: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Chang Dong Han; Taegwon Oh; Sang-Nae Cho; Jae Ho Yang; Kwan Kyu Park
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Comparison between titanium mesh and autogenous iliac bone graft to restore vertebral height through posterior approach for the treatment of thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis.

Authors:  Yongjian Gao; Yunsheng Ou; Qianxing Deng; Bin He; Xing Du; Jianxiao Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.