Literature DB >> 11933068

In silico two-hybrid system for the selection of physically interacting protein pairs.

Florencio Pazos1, Alfonso Valencia.   

Abstract

Deciphering the interaction links between proteins has become one of the main tasks of experimental and bioinformatic methodologies. Reconstruction of complex networks of interactions in simple cellular systems by integrating predicted interaction networks with available experimental data is becoming one of the most demanding needs in the postgenomic era. On the basis of the study of correlated mutations in multiple sequence alignments, we propose a new method (in silico two-hybrid, i2h) that directly addresses the detection of physically interacting protein pairs and identifies the most likely sequence regions involved in the interactions. We have applied the system to several test sets, showing that it can discriminate between true and false interactions in a significant number of cases. We have also analyzed a large collection of E. coli protein pairs as a first step toward the virtual reconstruction of its complete interaction network. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11933068     DOI: 10.1002/prot.10074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  74 in total

1.  Computational approaches to protein-protein interaction.

Authors:  Giacomo Franzot; Oliviero Carugo
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2003

2.  Coevolution of gene expression among interacting proteins.

Authors:  Hunter B Fraser; Aaron E Hirsh; Dennis P Wall; Michael B Eisen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Proteome-wide prediction of protein-protein interactions from high-throughput data.

Authors:  Zhi-Ping Liu; Luonan Chen
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 14.870

4.  Tight coevolution of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-partner interaction networks in fungi leads to interspecies network incompatibility.

Authors:  Lyad Zamir; Marianna Zaretsky; Yearit Fridman; Hadas Ner-Gaon; Eitan Rubin; Amir Aharoni
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Co-evolution analysis on endocrine research: a methodological approach.

Authors:  Tonghai Dou; Shuai Chen; Chaoneng Ji; Yi Xie; Yumin Mao
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.633

6.  Predicting protein-protein interaction by searching evolutionary tree automorphism space.

Authors:  Raja Jothi; Maricel G Kann; Teresa M Przytycka
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Assessing the limits of genomic data integration for predicting protein networks.

Authors:  Long J Lu; Yu Xia; Alberto Paccanaro; Haiyuan Yu; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Co-evolutionary analysis of domains in interacting proteins reveals insights into domain-domain interactions mediating protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Raja Jothi; Praveen F Cherukuri; Asba Tasneem; Teresa M Przytycka
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 9.  Computational prediction of protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Lucy Skrabanek; Harpreet K Saini; Gary D Bader; Anton J Enright
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 10.  Membrane protein prediction methods.

Authors:  Marco Punta; Lucy R Forrest; Henry Bigelow; Andrew Kernytsky; Jinfeng Liu; Burkhard Rost
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.608

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.