Literature DB >> 11932849

Mobility status during inpatient rehabilitation: a comparison of patients with stroke and traumatic brain injury.

Janice J Eng1, Sarah J Rowe, Linda M McLaren.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the mobility status (admission and discharge status, change in status) between patients with stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI) during inpatient rehabilitation and to determine the relationship between mobility status and outcome variables including length of stay (LOS).
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: Free-standing tertiary rehabilitation center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 210 patients with stroke (n = 136) and TBI (n = 74) consecutively admitted for inpatient rehabilitation.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical Outcome Variable Scale (COVS), a 13-item scale of mobility status (measured on admission and discharge from inpatient rehabilitation), and rehabilitation LOS.
RESULTS: With age and time since injury controlled in the model, the TBI group showed a significantly higher mobility status on admission and discharge over the stroke group, but the change (improvement) in mobility status did not differ. The admission mobility status accounted for 61% and 60% of variability of the discharge mobility status for the stroke and TBI groups, respectively. The admission mobility status accounted for 40% and 50% of the variability in rehabilitation LOS for the stroke and TBI groups, respectively. Either the admission mobility status or the physical therapist's prediction of the discharge status could be used to determine the actual discharge mobility status, although the physical therapist's predictions were more accurate than using a statistical model.
CONCLUSIONS: The TBI group showed a higher mobility status at admission and discharge from inpatient rehabilitation than the stroke group; however, the rate of improvement (improvement in mobility status per day) did not differ between groups. Admission mobility status using the COVS was an excellent predictor of discharge mobility status and rehabilitation LOS in stroke and TBI patients. Copyright 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11932849      PMCID: PMC3478323          DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2002.31203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  29 in total

1.  Who makes the most progress in inpatient rehabilitation? An analysis of functional gain.

Authors:  R G Carey; J H Seibert; E J Posavac
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference.

Authors:  C Merbitz; J Morris; J C Grip
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 3.  Prediction of function after stroke: a critical review.

Authors:  L Jongbloed
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1986 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Observations are always ordinal; measurements, however, must be interval.

Authors:  B D Wright; J M Linacre
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Predicting inpatient rehabilitation length of stay.

Authors:  M G Stineman; S V Williams
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Discharge outcome after stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  C V Granger; B B Hamilton; R C Fiedler
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Does age affect benefits of stroke unit rehabilitation?

Authors:  L Kalra
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Epidemiology of some neurological diseases with special reference to work load on the NHS.

Authors:  D T Wade; R L Hewer
Journal:  Int Rehabil Med       Date:  1987

9.  Motor and functional recovery after stroke: accuracy of physical therapists' predictions.

Authors:  N Korner-Bitensky; N Mayo; R Cabot; R Becker; H Coopersmith
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Recovery time of independent function post-stroke.

Authors:  N E Mayo; N A Korner-Bitensky; R Becker
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.159

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanics of reaching: clinical implications for individuals with acquired brain injury.

Authors:  P H McCrea; J J Eng; A J Hodgson
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2002-07-10       Impact factor: 3.033

2.  Characteristics of Dysphagia in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: A Comparison With Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Won Kyung Lee; Jiwoon Yeom; Woo Hyung Lee; Han Gil Seo; Byung-Mo Oh; Tai Ryoon Han
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2016-06-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.