Literature DB >> 11932605

Characterization of midface maxillary membranous bone formation during distraction osteogenesis.

Adi Rachmiel1, Nimrod Rozen, Micha Peled, Dina Lewinson.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to follow the early events in bone formation and neovascularization during maxillary distraction and after the consolidation period and to define the characterization of the new bone in the distracted area. Maxillary osteotomy was performed in seven sheep. In five animals, an external distraction device was used for maxillary lengthening of 20 mm at a rate of 1 mm/day for 20 days. Another two animals served as controls without distraction. Sequential biopsies were performed. The methods used for analysis were histologic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural by transmission electron microscopy. During the 5 days of latency, a fibrin clot was formed that after 5 days of distraction was replaced by granulation tissue, proliferating mesenchyme-like cells, and capillaries. After 10 days of distraction, the regenerated tissue could be divided into three main zones and two transitional areas: a central zone occupied by many polygonal mesenchyme-like cells and spindle-shaped cells that proliferated intensively; two paracentral zones on both sides of the central zone in which many cells showed morphologic signs of apoptosis leading to a decreased number of fibroblast-like cells embedded in wavy collagen fibers; a transitional area from the central to the paracentral zone in which concentric cellular colonies were believed to represent a novel form of vasculogenesis; distal-proximal zones, located on both sides of the paracentral zones and in continuation with the old bone, showed delicate new woven bone trabeculae that grew continuously in the direction of lengthening and gradually became mineralized; and a transitional area from the paracentral to the distal-proximal zones in which there was recruitment of preosteoblasts from the distracted tissue to the trabecular tips. These further differentiated into osteoblasts that contributed to the trabecular growth. The histologic feature pattern was similar after 15 and 20 days of continuous distraction. At the end of lengthening, after 20 days, delicate longitudinally oriented trabeculae continued to grow by recruiting preosteogenic cells from the central distracted tissue, became mineralized, and were rimmed by osteoblasts. After 6 weeks of retention, the trabeculae thickened and consisted of a mixture of lamellar and woven bone. In conclusion, the distraction force creates a pool of undifferentiated mesenchyme-like cells with osteogenic potential and triggers capillary formation, a clear zonation can be observed during active lengthening, and new bone trabeculae begin to form between 5 and 10 days after distraction, soon become aligned with osteoblasts, and continue to grow as long as distraction force is applied. This characterization may help in any exogenous involvement with growth factors to improve bone quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11932605     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200204150-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  7 in total

1.  External versus Internal Distraction Devices in Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Craniofacial Anomalies.

Authors:  Adi Rachmiel; Saleh Nseir; Omri Emodi; Dror Aizenbud
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-08-07

2.  The use of distraction osteogenesis in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Adi Rachmiel; Dekel Shilo
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015 Jul-Dec

Review 3.  Biomolecular phases in transverse palatal distraction: A review.

Authors:  Ibrahim Alshahrani
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.219

4.  Treatment outcome and long-term stability of skeletal changes following maxillary distraction in adult subjects of cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Satinder Pal Singh; Ashok Kumar Jena; Vidya Rattan; Ashok Kumar Utreja
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2012-04

5.  Treatment of maxillary cleft palate: Distraction osteogenesis vs. orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Adi Rachmiel; Michal Even-Almos; Dror Aizenbud
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-07

6.  The Molecular and Cellular Events That Take Place during Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Adi Rachmiel; Yoav Leiser
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-02-07

Review 7.  Immunomodulatory effects and mechanisms of distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Shude Yang; Ning Wang; Yutong Ma; Shuaichen Guo; Shu Guo; Hongchen Sun
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 6.344

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.