Literature DB >> 11931065

Nucleus pulposus-induced nerve root injury: effects of diclofenac and ketoprofen.

M Cornefjord1, K Olmarker, K Otani, B Rydevik.   

Abstract

MAIN PROBLEM: Nucleus pulposus and/or chronic compression can induce spinal nerve root injury. Inflammation has been proposed as having major importance in the pathophysiologic mechanisms involved in the induction of such injuries. Corticosteroids, potent anti-inflammatory drugs, have been demonstrated to reduce nucleus pulposus-induced spinal nerve root injury. The aim of the present study was to assess the effects of two potent non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), diclofenac and ketoprofen, in experimental nucleus pulposus-induced spinal nerve root injury in a pig model.
METHODS: Eighteen pigs were included in the study. Autologous nucleus pulposus was harvested from a lumbar disc and applied locally around the first sacral nerve root after a partial laminectomy of the first and second sacral vertebrae. Six pigs were treated with daily intramuscular injections of diclofenac, 3 mg/kg body weight, for 7 days. Six other pigs were treated with daily intramuscular injections of ketoprofen, 4 mg/kg body weight, for 7 days. As controls, six pigs received injections with physiologic saline. After 7 days, the pigs were reanesthetized and the nerve conduction velocity over the exposed nerve root area was determined.
RESULTS: The nerve conduction velocity was significantly higher in pigs treated with diclofenac than in the saline-treated controls, (57 +/- 6 m/s vs 38 +/- 18 m/s, P<0.05, Student's t-test). The velocity in pigs treated with ketoprofen, 42 +/- 24 m/s, did not differ significantly from that of controls.
CONCLUSIONS: This study of two potent NSAIDs indicates that nucleus pulposus-induced nerve root dysfunction may be reduced by diclofenac but not by ketoprofen. The reason for this difference is not known, but it might be related to the fact that ketoprofen and diclofenac belong to different NSAID subgroups and have a different selectivity for the two cyclo-oxygenases COX-1 and COX-2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11931065      PMCID: PMC3610489          DOI: 10.1007/s005860100299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  6 in total

Review 1.  A hypothesis of chronic back pain: ligament subfailure injuries lead to muscle control dysfunction.

Authors:  Manohar M Panjabi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The effect of perioperative corticosteroids on the outcome of microscopic lumbar disc surgery.

Authors:  Anders Lundin; Anders Magnuson; Kjell Axelsson; Heinz Kogler; Lars Samuelsson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-08-02       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Modulation of the In Vivo Inflammatory Response by Pro- Versus Anti-Inflammatory Intervertebral Disc Treatments.

Authors:  Carla Cunha; Graciosa Q Teixeira; Cláudia Ribeiro-Machado; Catarina L Pereira; Joana R Ferreira; Maria Molinos; Susana G Santos; Mário A Barbosa; Raquel M Goncalves
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Intravenous Corticosteroid Therapy for Acute Lumbar Radicular Pain.

Authors:  Oded Hershkovich; Yaakov Mor; Raphael Lotan
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Novel Treatment of Radicular Pain With a Multi-Mechanistic Combination Topical Agent: A Case Series and Literature Review.

Authors:  Pegah Safaeian; Ryan Mattie; Matthew Hahn; Christopher T Plastaras; Zachary L McCormick
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2016-03-01

6.  Interaoperative use of epidural methylprednisolone or bupivacaine for postsurgical lumbar discectomy pain relief: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Iraj Lotfinia; Esmaeel Khallaghi; Ali Meshkini; Moslem Shakeri; Mohammad Shima; Abdolrasol Safaeian
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.526

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.