Literature DB >> 11931060

Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open surgery: an intraoperative EMG study.

U Schick1, J Döhnert, A Richter, A König, H E Vitzthum.   

Abstract

This study investigated electromyographic (EMG) activity as a marker of nerve root irritation during two different surgical procedures for lumbar disc herniation. Mechanically elicited EMG activity was recorded during the dynamic stages of surgery in muscle groups innervated by lumbar nerve roots. Confirmation of surgical activity was correlated with the activity of the electromyogram. Fifteen patients with lumbar disc herniations were treated via an endoscopic medial approach, and 15 patients via the open microscopic surgical technique. Results indicated that the endoscopic technique was superior to the open surgical technique and produced less irritation of the nerve root. Significantly less mechanically elicited activity was recorded during both the approach and the root mobilization. The study showed that microendoscopic discectomy allows a smaller incision and less tissue trauma with comparable visualization of the nerve structures than does open surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11931060      PMCID: PMC3610497          DOI: 10.1007/s005860100315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  30 in total

1.  The efficacy of minimally invasive discectomy compared with open discectomy: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Hormuzdiyar H Dasenbrock; Stephen P Juraschek; Lonni R Schultz; Timothy F Witham; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ali Bydon
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-03-09

2.  Irrigation endoscopic discectomy: a novel percutaneous approach for lumbar disc prolapse.

Authors:  Hesham Magdi Soliman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Microendoscopic discectomy versus open discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  JuLiang He; ShanWen Xiao; ZhenJie Wu; ZhenChao Yuan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Minimally invasive surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Steven J Kamper; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Sidney M Rubinstein; Jorm M Nellensteijn; Wilco C Peul; Mark P Arts; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Current techniques of endoscopic decompression in spine surgery.

Authors:  Yong Ahn
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

6.  Outcomes of Microendoscopic Discectomy and Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Comparative Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Arjun Sinkemani; Xin Hong; Zeng-Xin Gao; Su-Yang Zhuang; Zan-Li Jiang; Shao-Dong Zhang; Jun-Ping Bao; Lei Zhu; Pei Zhang; Xin-Hui Xie; Feng Wang; Xiao-Tao Wu
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-12-08

7.  Minimally Invasive Muscle Sparing Transmuscular Microdiscectomy : Technique and Comparison with Conventional Subperiosteal Microdiscectomy during the Early Postoperative Period.

Authors:  Beom-Seok Park; Young-Joon Kwon; Yu-Sam Won; Hyun-Chul Shin
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-09-30

8.  Endoscopic lumbar discectomy: Experience of first 100 cases.

Authors:  Amit Jhala; Manish Mistry
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 9.  A systematic review of randomised clinical trials using posterior discectomy to treat lumbar disc herniations.

Authors:  Alberto Gotfryd; Osmar Avanzi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Lumbar microdiscectomy: subperiosteal versus transmuscular approach and influence on the early postoperative analgesic consumption.

Authors:  Marko Brock; Philip Kunkel; Luca Papavero
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.