Literature DB >> 11930538

[Sonographically guided core needle biopsy of the breast: technique, accuracy and indications].

W Buchberger1, A Niehoff, P Obrist, G Rettl, M Dünser.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to assess the diagnostic accuracy and complication rate of sonographically guided core needle biopsy in palpable breast masses, mammographically detected nonpalpable lesions, and sonographically detected clinically and mammographically occult lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sonographically guided core needle biopsy was performed in 590 lesions in 572 patients, by using an automated biopsy gun with a 14-gauge large core needle and a coaxial system. Core needle biopsy results were compared with surgical biopsy in 265 cases. 325 lesions with benign histologic diagnoses were followed up for at least 18 months.
RESULTS: 234 carcinomas and 356 benign abnormalities were found in the 572 patients. Core needle biopsy reached a sensitivity of 98.7% at a specificity of 99.7%. Underestimation rates for lesions initially diagnosed as DCIS and for lesions initially diagnosed as ADH were 3/10 and 6/14, respectively. Of three false-negative results, two were immediately recognized, and one was identified at follow-up. Serious bleeding occurred in one patient (0.2% complication rate).
CONCLUSIONS: This report confirms that sonographically guided large core needle biopsy is a safe, reliable and cost-effective method for the assessment of both palpable and nonpalpable, mammographically and sonographically detected breast abnormalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11930538     DOI: 10.1007/s117-002-8113-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  11 in total

Review 1.  Stereotactic and ultrasound-guided breast biopsy.

Authors:  T H Helbich; W Matzek; M H Fuchsjäger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  [Percutaneous large core breast biopsy].

Authors:  K Prechtel; J de Waal; A Nerlich; D Hölzel; J Weitz
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 3.  Accuracy of ultrasound-guided, large-core needle breast biopsy.

Authors:  G Schueller; C Schueller-Weidekamm; T H Helbich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  How safe is the use of ultrasound-guided cutting needle biopsy in the head and neck?

Authors:  Jens Pfeiffer; Gerd J Ridder
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  [Sonographically guided, minimally invasive biopsy of uncertain mammary lesions. Clinical experience with a new biopsy system].

Authors:  H Sittek; A Wieser; M Kessler; S Britsch; C Vick; M Untch; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Can concurrent core biopsy and fine needle aspiration biopsy improve the false negative rate of sonographically detectable breast lesions?

Authors:  Yao-Lung Kuo; Tsai-Wang Chang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Ultrasound-guided diagnostic breast biopsy methodology: retrospective comparison of the 8-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy approach versus the spring-loaded 14-gauge core biopsy approach.

Authors:  Stephen P Povoski; Rafael E Jimenez; Wenle P Wang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  False-negative results of breast core needle biopsies - retrospective analysis of 988 biopsies.

Authors:  Marek Boba; Urszula Kołtun; Barbara Bobek-Billewicz; Ewa Chmielik; Bartosz Eksner; Tomasz Olejnik
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2011-01

9.  The negative predictive value of ultrasound-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: a validation study of 339 cases.

Authors:  Charlie Zhang; Darrell R Lewis; Paola Nasute; Malcolm Hayes; Linda J Warren; Paula B Gordon
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed using an ultrasound-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: can underestimation be predicted preoperatively?

Authors:  Sung Hee Park; Min Jung Kim; Soo Jin Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2014-02-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.