Literature DB >> 11929511

Economic analyses and clinical practice guidelines: why not a match made in heaven?

Scott D Ramsey.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11929511      PMCID: PMC1495017          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.20110.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


× No keyword cloud information.
  16 in total

Review 1.  Design issues for conducting cost-effectiveness analyses alongside clinical trials.

Authors:  S D Ramsey; M McIntosh; S D Sullivan
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 21.981

2.  Problems with the interpretation of pharmacoeconomic analyses: a review of submissions to the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.

Authors:  S R Hill; A S Mitchell; D A Henry
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-04-26       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Evaluation of conflict of interest in economic analyses of new drugs used in oncology.

Authors:  M Friedberg; B Saffran; T J Stinson; W Nelson; C L Bennett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  A comprehensive league table of cost-utility ratios and a sub-table of "panel-worthy" studies.

Authors:  R H Chapman; P W Stone; E A Sandberg; C Bell; P J Neumann
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2000 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  The impact of pipeline drugs on drug spending growth.

Authors:  C D Mullins; J Wang; F B Palumbo; B Stuart
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 6.  The limited incorporation of economic analyses in clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Joel F Wallace; Scott R Weingarten; Chiun-Fang Chiou; James M Henning; Andriana A Hohlbauch; Margaret S Richards; Nicole S Herzog; Lior S Lewensztain; Joshua J Ofman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations.

Authors:  A Laupacis; D Feeny; A S Detsky; P X Tugwell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  The effectiveness of cost-effectiveness analysis in containing costs.

Authors:  N A Azimi; H G Welch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Can the health utilities index measure change?

Authors:  J A Kopec; S E Schultz; V Goel; J Ivan Williams
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Guidelines for the adoption of new technologies: a prescription for uncontrolled growth in expenditures and how to avoid the problem.

Authors:  A Gafni; S Birch
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evidence and advocacy: are all things considered?

Authors:  Jeffrey A Johnson; Alun L Edwards
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Predictors of the growing influence of clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Ann S O'malley; Hoangmai H Pham; James D Reschovsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Incorporating cost-effectiveness data in a fair process for priority setting efforts Comment on "Use of cost-effectiveness data in priority setting decisions: experiences from the national guidelines for heart diseases in Sweden".

Authors:  Sitaporn Youngkong
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2015-04-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.