Literature DB >> 11928103

Effects of fixation type and guided tissue regeneration on maxillary osteotomy healing in rabbits.

Kraig Stetzer1, Greg Cooper, Robert Gassner, Rusen Kapucu, Robert Mundell, Mark P Mooney.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The development of fibrous nonunions after orthognathic surgery is thought to result from an interaction of biomechanical stress and the differential and more rapid migration of fibroblasts (compared with osteoblasts) into the wound site during healing. The present study was designed to test this hypothesis through the manipulation of guided tissue regeneration and osteotomy fixation techniques in an experimental rabbit model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bilateral critical size (4 mm) defects (n = 24) were produced in the maxillae of 12 adult New Zealand white rabbits. The maxillary segments were rigidly or nonrigidly fixed using bone microplates and screws or osteosynthetic wires. The defects were then covered with a resorbable collagen membrane or left uncovered. The rabbits were followed for 4 weeks with the use of serial dorsoventral and lateral oblique cephalographs, and the maxillae were then harvested for histologic analyses.
RESULTS: Radiographic and histomorphometric analyses revealed that rigidly fixed defects, covered with membrane, showed the most rapid and organized new bone formation. The rigidly fixed defects with the membrane averaged approximately 40% more new bone in the osteotomy site compared with the rigidly fixed defects with no membrane. Nonrigidly fixed defects with no membrane showed an ingrowth of fibroblasts and fibrous nonunions.
CONCLUSIONS: These experimental results suggest that an interaction between the decreased fibrous tissue ingrowth through guided tissue regeneration and osteotomy segment stability from rigid fixation prevented postoperative fibrous nonunions and facilitated new bone regeneration and osteotomy site healing in this rabbit model. Copyright 2002 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:427-436, 2002

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11928103     DOI: 10.1053/joms.2002.31232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  6 in total

Review 1.  Biomimetic coatings for bone tissue engineering of critical-sized defects.

Authors:  Yuelian Liu; Gang Wu; Klaas de Groot
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited.

Authors:  Ibrahim Elgali; Omar Omar; Christer Dahlin; Peter Thomsen
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 2.612

Review 3.  The role of barrier membranes for guided bone regeneration and restoration of large bone defects: current experimental and clinical evidence.

Authors:  Rozalia Dimitriou; George I Mataliotakis; Giorgio Maria Calori; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 4.  Biomaterials with Antibacterial and Osteoinductive Properties to Repair Infected Bone Defects.

Authors:  Haiping Lu; Yi Liu; Jing Guo; Huiling Wu; Jingxiao Wang; Gang Wu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Barrier membranes: More than the barrier effect?

Authors:  Omar Omar; Ibrahim Elgali; Christer Dahlin; Peter Thomsen
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 8.728

6.  Tensile Properties of Three Selected Collagen Membranes.

Authors:  Perry Raz; Tamar Brosh; Guy Ronen; Haim Tal
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.