CONTEXT: The benefits of continuity of pediatric care remain controversial. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is an association between having a continuous relationship with a primary care pediatric provider and improved quality of care by parental report. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND POPULATION: Seven hundred fifty-nine patients presenting to a primary care clinic completed surveys, which included validated measures of provider and clinic quality of care from the Consumer Assessment of Health Plan Survey. MAIN EXPOSURE VARIABLE: A continuity of care index that quantifies the degree to which a patient has experienced continuous care with a provider. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The likelihood of parents reporting quality of care as high in several provider- specific items including reporting that providers respected what they had to say, treated them with courtesy and respect, listened to them carefully, explained things in a way they could understand, and spent enough time with their children. In addition, participants were asked to rate the overall quality of the clinic and their child's provider on a 10-point scale. RESULTS: In ordered logistic regression models, continuity of care was associated with statistically significantly higher Consumer Assessment of Health Plan Survey scores for 5 of the 6 items, including feeling that providers respected what parents had to say; listened carefully to them; explained things in a way that they could understand; asked about how their child was feeling, growing, and behaving; and spent enough time with their child. In addition, greater continuity of care was associated with a higher clinic rating, as well as a higher provider rating. CONCLUSIONS: Greater continuity of primary care is associated with higher quality of care as reported by parents. Efforts to improve and maintain continuity may be warranted.
CONTEXT: The benefits of continuity of pediatric care remain controversial. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is an association between having a continuous relationship with a primary care pediatric provider and improved quality of care by parental report. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND POPULATION: Seven hundred fifty-nine patients presenting to a primary care clinic completed surveys, which included validated measures of provider and clinic quality of care from the Consumer Assessment of Health Plan Survey. MAIN EXPOSURE VARIABLE: A continuity of care index that quantifies the degree to which a patient has experienced continuous care with a provider. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The likelihood of parents reporting quality of care as high in several provider- specific items including reporting that providers respected what they had to say, treated them with courtesy and respect, listened to them carefully, explained things in a way they could understand, and spent enough time with their children. In addition, participants were asked to rate the overall quality of the clinic and their child's provider on a 10-point scale. RESULTS: In ordered logistic regression models, continuity of care was associated with statistically significantly higher Consumer Assessment of Health Plan Survey scores for 5 of the 6 items, including feeling that providers respected what parents had to say; listened carefully to them; explained things in a way that they could understand; asked about how their child was feeling, growing, and behaving; and spent enough time with their child. In addition, greater continuity of care was associated with a higher clinic rating, as well as a higher provider rating. CONCLUSIONS: Greater continuity of primary care is associated with higher quality of care as reported by parents. Efforts to improve and maintain continuity may be warranted.
Authors: Alex Y Chen; Marc N Elliott; Karen L Spritzer; Julie A Brown; Samuel A Skootsky; Cliff Rowley; Ron D Hays Journal: Med Care Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Rachel O Reid; J Scott Ashwood; Mark W Friedberg; Ellerie S Weber; Claude M Setodji; Ateev Mehrotra Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-10-16 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Paul A Nutting; Meredith A Goodwin; Susan A Flocke; Stephen J Zyzanski; Kurt C Stange Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2003 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.166