Literature DB >> 11927525

Coronary flow velocity reserve after percutaneous interventions is predictive of periprocedural outcome.

M Albertal1, M Voskuil, J J Piek, B de Bruyne, G Van Langenhove, P I Kay, M A Costa, E Boersma, T Beijsterveldt, J E Sousa, J A Belardi, P W Serruys.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because heterogeneous results have been reported, we assessed coronary flow velocity changes in individuals who underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and examined their impact on clinical outcome. METHODS AND
RESULTS: As part of the Doppler Endpoints Balloon Angioplasty Trial Europe (DEBATE) II study, 379 patients underwent Doppler flow-guided angioplasty. All patients were evaluated according to their coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) results (> or =2.5 or < 2.5) at the end of the procedure. A CFVR < 2.5 after angioplasty was associated with an elevated baseline blood flow velocity in both the target artery and reference artery. CFVR before PTCA and CFVR in the reference artery were independent predictors of an optimal CFVR after balloon angioplasty (CFVR before PTCA: odds ratio [OR], 2.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.57 to 3.24; CFVR in reference artery: OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.21 to 2.98; both P<0.001) and stent implantation (before PTCA: OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.47 to 4.36; reference artery: OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.07 to 3.87; both P<0.05). A low CFVR at the end of the procedure was an independent predictor of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days (OR, 4.71; 95% CI, 1.14 to 25.92; P=0.034) and at 1 year (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.16 to 3.66; P=0.014). After excluding MACE at 30 days, no difference in MACE at 1 year was observed between the patients with and without a CFVR < 2.5 at the end of the procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: A low postprocedural CFVR was associated with a worse periprocedural outcome (which was related to microcirculatory disturbances), but there was no significant difference at late follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11927525     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.0000012514.15806.dd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  11 in total

Review 1.  Coronary physiology assessment in the catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Felipe Díez-Delhoyo; Enrique Gutiérrez-Ibañes; Gerard Loughlin; Ricardo Sanz-Ruiz; María Eugenia Vázquez-Álvarez; Fernando Sarnago-Cebada; Rocío Angulo-Llanos; Ana Casado-Plasencia; Jaime Elízaga; Francisco Fernández Avilés Diáz
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-26

Review 2.  Endothelial dysfunction over the course of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Enrique Gutiérrez; Andreas J Flammer; Lilach O Lerman; Jaime Elízaga; Amir Lerman; Francisco Fernández-Avilés
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Prognostic value of coronary flow reserve and aortic distensibility indices in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Attila Nemes; Tamás Forster; Marcel L Geleijnse; Osama I I Soliman; Folkert J Ten Cate; Miklós Csanády
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  In women with symptoms of cardiac ischemia, nonobstructive coronary arteries, and microvascular dysfunction, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition is associated with improved microvascular function: A double-blind randomized study from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE).

Authors:  Daniel F Pauly; B Delia Johnson; R David Anderson; Eileen M Handberg; Karen M Smith; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff; George Sopko; Barry M Sharaf; Sheryl F Kelsey; C Noel Bairey Merz; Carl J Pepine
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Microcirculatory significance of periprocedural myocardial necrosis after percutaneous coronary intervention assessed by the index of microcirculatory resistance.

Authors:  Zhiming Wu; Fei Ye; Wei You; Junjie Zhang; Dujiang Xie; Shaoliang Chen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  The assessment of endothelial function: from research into clinical practice.

Authors:  Andreas J Flammer; Todd Anderson; David S Celermajer; Mark A Creager; John Deanfield; Peter Ganz; Naomi M Hamburg; Thomas F Lüscher; Michael Shechter; Stefano Taddei; Joseph A Vita; Amir Lerman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  Physiological Consequences of Coronary Arteriolar Dysfunction and Its Influence on Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Hassan Allaqaband; David D Gutterman; Andrew O Kadlec
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-09-01

Review 8.  Coronary flow reserve in stress-echo lab. From pathophysiologic toy to diagnostic tool.

Authors:  Fausto Rigo
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2005-03-25       Impact factor: 2.062

9.  Selective endothelin A-receptor blockade attenuates coronary microvascular dysfunction after coronary stenting in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Nikolaos Ostlund Papadogeorgos; Mattias Bengtsson; Majid Kalani
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2009-11-02

Review 10.  Coronary flow reserve from mouse to man--from mechanistic understanding to future interventions.

Authors:  Li-Ming Gan; Johannes Wikström; Regina Fritsche-Danielson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.