Literature DB >> 11927299

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for UPJ obstruction with crossing vessels: contrast-enhanced color Doppler findings and long-term outcome.

Ferdinand Frauscher1, Guenter Janetschek, Andrea Klauser, Reinhard Peschel, Ethan J Halpern, Leo Pallwein, Gernot Helweg, Dieter zur Nedden, Georg Bartsch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate, in the present long-term follow-up study, contrast-enhanced color Doppler imaging (CDI) findings and the clinical outcome of patients with crossing vessels at the obstructed ureteropelvic junction (UPJ), who underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty. In a previous study, contrast-enhanced CDI proved capable of detecting crossing vessels at the UPJ.
METHODS: A total of 23 patients, who had undergone laparoscopic pyeloplasty and displacement of crossing vessels for UPJ obstruction at least 2 years before this study (mean 27 months), underwent contrast-enhanced CDI, intravenous urography, and renography. Contrast-enhanced CDI was performed using intravenously administered Levovist to assess the displacement of the vessels relative to the UPJ. All patients completed analog follow-up pain scales and quality-of-life assessment questionnaires. RESULTS. Contrast-enhanced CDI revealed a cranial displacement (mean 1.3 cm) of the crossing vessels from the UPJ in all 23 cases. Intravenous urography showed a decrease in the degree of hydronephrosis, with a success rate of 100% in low-grade and 86% in high-grade hydronephrosis. The split renal function improved from 39.7% to 48.1%. Analog pain scale measurements demonstrated a mean improvement in pain of 92% (range 73% to 100%) and a mean quality-of-life score of 94 (range 78 to 100).
CONCLUSIONS: Our series of patients with crossing vessels at the UPJ treated by laparoscopic pyeloplasty showed an excellent long-term successful outcome. Contrast-enhanced CDI allows for preoperative detection, as well as postoperative assessment, of the displacement of the crossing vessel. We recommend that the presence of a crossing vessel be routinely determined preoperatively, because it may influence the choice of treatment modality and thereby the clinical outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11927299     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01621-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  7 in total

1.  [Reconstructive procedures in laparoscopic urology].

Authors:  G Janetschek
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Comparison of surgical approaches to ureteropelvic junction obstruction: endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Robert J Stein; Inderbir S Gill; Mihir M Desai
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Laparoscopic single-incision triangulated umbilical surgery (SITUS) pyeloplasty: a description of the first 32 cases.

Authors:  Martin Habicher; Theodoros Tokas; Thomas Rw Herrmann; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Dismembered and non-dismembered retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.

Authors:  Svetozar Subotic; Hagen Weiss; Stephen Wyler; Cyrill A Rentsch; Jens Rassweiler; Alexander Bachmann; Dogu Teber
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  [Experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty for treating ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. Technique and results].

Authors:  S Subotic; M Schulze; A Gözen; J Rassweiler; D Teber
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction due to aberrant blood vessel with ipsilateral retrocaval ureter.

Authors:  Yuta Inoue; Yasuyuki Naitoh; Jun Ajiki; Ayako Fukui; Takeshi Yamada; Atsuko Fujihara; Kaori Yamada; Fumiya Hongo; Osamu Ukimura
Journal:  IJU Case Rep       Date:  2021-06-03

7.  Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: a multi-institutional prospective study.

Authors:  Mohamed Gadelmoula; Mohammad S Abdel-Kader; Mahmoud Shalaby; Mostafa Abdelrazek; Ahmed Mohamed Moeen; Mohamed Ali Zarzour; Nasreldin Mohammed; Paolo Fornara
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2018-08-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.