Literature DB >> 11927294

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and older age are associated with adverse sexual health-related quality-of-life outcome after prostate brachytherapy.

Brent K Hollenbeck1, Rodney L Dunn, John T Wei, Patrick W McLaughlin, Michael Han, Martin G Sanda.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Brachytherapy is increasingly used as a treatment for localized prostate cancer but information regarding long-term, postimplantation, patient-reported sexual health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) is scant. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy is commonly administered with brachytherapy, yet its potentially adverse effects on subsequent sexual health have not been described using a validated HRQOL instrument. We used a validated HRQOL survey to characterize the significance of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and other baseline factors on postimplantation sexual function and impairment.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey using the expanded prostate cancer index composite HRQOL instrument was administered to all 114 localized prostate cancer patients who underwent ultrasound-guided, transperineal brachytherapy during a 4-year period and to 142 age-matched control men. Multivariable models measured the association of baseline factors and covariates with postimplantation sexual HRQOL.
RESULTS: Older age (P = 0.01) and neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (P = 0.009) were independently associated with diminished sexual HRQOL after prostate brachytherapy. Among patients younger than 69 years old, 33% reported at least fair sexual function after brachytherapy alone compared with 19% of men after brachytherapy with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. Of the age-matched control men younger than 69 years old, 78% reported at least fair sexual function. Among patients older than 69 years, 26% reported at least fair sexual function after brachytherapy alone compared with 5% after brachytherapy with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, and 61% of age-matched controls reported at least fair sexual function.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient age and neoadjuvant hormonal therapy are independent, significant determinants of sexual HRQOL after prostate brachytherapy. These factors should be taken into consideration when counseling patients with localized prostate cancer regarding the expected, postimplantation sexual HRQOL outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11927294     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01664-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  10 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy leads to immediate impairment of vitality/hormonal and sexual quality of life: results of a multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  Hiram Alberto Gay; Jeff M Michalski; Daniel A Hamstra; John T Wei; Rodney L Dunn; Eric A Klein; Howard M Sandler; Chris Saigal; Mark Litwin; Deborah Kuban; Larry Hembroff; Peter Chang; Martin G Sanda
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Pretreatment depressive symptoms and treatment modality predict post-treatment disease-specific quality of life among patients with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nihal E Mohamed; Dana H Bovbjerg; Guy H Montgomery; Simon J Hall; Michael A Diefenbach
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 3.  The current and potential role of cryoablation as a primary therapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Aaron E Katz; John C Rewcastle
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Evaluation of erectile potency and radiation dose to the penile bulb using image guided radiotherapy in the CHHiP trial.

Authors:  Julia Murray; Sarah Gulliford; Clare Griffin; Anna Wilkins; Isabel Syndikus; John Staffurth; Miguel Panades; Christopher Scrase; Chris Parker; Vincent Khoo; Jamie Dean; Helen Mayles; Philip Mayles; Simon Thomas; Olivia Naismith; Helen Mossop; Clare Cruickshank; Emma Hall; David Dearnaley
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-12-31

Review 5.  Permanent interstitial brachytherapy for prostate cancer: a current review.

Authors:  Jeffrey Woolsey; Nicole Miller; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-08-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Comparative effectiveness of robotic and open radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Rodrigo Rodrigues Pessoa; Paul Maroni; Janet Kukreja; Simon P Kim
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-05

7.  Changes in sexual function and serum testosterone levels in patients with prostate cancer after image-guided proton therapy.

Authors:  Yukiko Hattori; Hiromitsu Iwata; Koichiro Nakajima; Kento Nomura; Kensuke Hayashi; Toshiyuki Toshito; Shingo Hashimoto; Yukihiro Umemoto; Jun-Etsu Mizoe; Hiroyuki Ogino; Yuta Shibamoto
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 8.  Sexual health recovery after prostatectomy, external radiation, or brachytherapy for early stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Brent K Hollenbeck; Rodney L Dunn; John T Wei; Howard M Sandler; Martin G Sanda
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 9.  Quality of life after treatment for prostate cancer.

Authors:  David F Penson; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.862

10.  Failure to address potential bias in non-randomised controlled clinical trials may cause lack of evidence on patient-reported outcomes: a method study.

Authors:  Frank Peinemann; Alexander Michael Labeit; Christian Thielscher; Michael Pinkawa
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.