| Literature DB >> 11927118 |
Lynn Artz1, Michael Demand, LeaVonne Pulley, Samuel F Posner, Maurizio Macaluso.
Abstract
This article describes the frequency of initial difficulty inserting the female condom and identifies predictors of insertion difficulty among women at risk of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Female STD clinic patients (n = 1144) were taught how to insert the female condom by using an anatomic model, then given an opportunity for self-insertion practice. Correct placement of the condom was verified by a nurse clinician, and the number of attempts required for correct insertion was recorded. Sociodemographic and psychosocial predictors of refusing the insertion practice and of difficulty inserting the female condom were evaluated using logistic regression. Only 5% of study participants refused the self-insertion practice. Women who never had a Papanicolaou smear test, did not use tampons, never used an inserted method of STD prevention/birth control, and disliked the insertion features of intravaginal barrier methods were more likely to refuse the self-insertion practice. Of those who attempted self-insertion, 25% were unable to insert the female condom correctly on the first attempt. Women who never expressed their sexual likes and were indifferent to the positive features of intravaginal contraceptive methods were more likely to experience difficulty their first insertion attempt. Other variables associated with insertion difficulty included longer fingernails. Insertion refusal and difficulty affect use of the female condom for a sizable proportion of women. Women in this study who refused the self-insertion practice had greater aversion to inserting intravaginal barrier methods. Women who had initial difficulty inserting the female condom had a different profile from those who refused and can benefit from intensive skills training that includes supervised self-insertion practice.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2002 PMID: 11927118 DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(01)00286-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contraception ISSN: 0010-7824 Impact factor: 3.375