Literature DB >> 11926195

Spatial characteristics of fine particulate matter: identifying representative monitoring locations in Seattle, Washington.

Emily Goswami1, Timothy Larson, Thomas Lumley, L J Sally Liu.   

Abstract

This study investigates how PM2.5 varies spatially and how these spatial characteristics can be used to identify potential monitoring sites that are most representative of the overall ambient exposures to PM2.5 among susceptible populations in the Seattle, WA, area. Data collected at outdoor sites at the homes of participants of a large exposure assessment study were used in this study. Harvard impactors (HIs) were used at 40 outdoor sites throughout the Seattle metropolitan area. Up to six sites at a time were monitored for 10 consecutive 24-hr average periods. A fixed-effect analysis of variance (ANOVA) model that included date and location effects was used to analyze the spatial variability of outdoor PM2.5 concentrations. Both date and location effects were shown to be highly significant, explaining 92% of the variability in outdoor PM2.5 measurements. The day-to-day variability was 10 times higher than the spatial variability between sites. The site mean square was more than twice the error mean square, showing that differences between sites, while modest, are potentially an important contribution to measurement error. Variances of the model residuals and site effects were examined against spatial characteristics of the monitoring sites. The spatial characteristics included elevation, distance from arterials, and distance from major PM2.5 point sources. Results showed that the most representative PM2.5 sites were located at elevations of 80-120 m above sea level, and at distances of 100-300 m from the nearest arterial road. Location relative to industrial PM2.5 sources is not a significant predictor of residential outdoor PM2.5 measurements. Additionally, for sites to be representative of the average population exposures to PM2.5 among those highly susceptible to the health effects of PM2.5, areas of high elderly population density were considered. These representative spatial characteristics were used as multiple, overlapping criteria in a Geographic Information System (GIS) analysis to determine where the most representative sites are located.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11926195     DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2002.10470778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.235


  7 in total

1.  Fine particulate matter air pollution, proximity to traffic, and aortic atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Ryan W Allen; Michael H Criqui; Ana V Diez Roux; Matthew Allison; Steven Shea; Robert Detrano; Lianne Sheppard; Nathan D Wong; Karen Hinckley Stukovsky; Joel D Kaufman
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  PM2.5 exposure and birth outcomes: use of satellite- and monitor-based data.

Authors:  Ayaz Hyder; Hyung Joo Lee; Keita Ebisu; Petros Koutrakis; Kathleen Belanger; Michelle Lee Bell
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Source apportionment of PM10 by positive matrix factorization in urban area of Mumbai, India.

Authors:  Indrani Gupta; Abhaysinh Salunkhe; Rakesh Kumar
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-05-03

4.  The air quality impacts of road closures associated with the 2004 Democratic National Convention in Boston.

Authors:  Jonathan I Levy; Lisa K Baxter; Jane E Clougherty
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 5.  The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Particulate Matter Health Effects Research Centers Program: a midcourse report of status, progress, and plans.

Authors:  Morton Lippmann; Mark Frampton; Joel Schwartz; Douglas Dockery; Richard Schlesinger; Petros Koutrakis; John Froines; Andre Nel; Jack Finkelstein; John Godleski; Joel Kaufman; Jane Koenig; Tim Larson; Dan Luchtel; L-J Sally Liu; Gunter Oberdorster; Annette Peters; Jeremy Sarnat; Constantinos Sioutas; Helen Suh; Jeff Sullivan; Mark Utell; Erich Wichmann; Judith Zelikoff
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Exposure assessment of particulate matter for susceptible populations in Seattle.

Authors:  L-J Sally Liu; Michael Box; David Kalman; Joel Kaufman; Jane Koenig; Tim Larson; Thomas Lumley; Lianne Sheppard; Lance Wallace
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Factors influencing the spatial extent of mobile source air pollution impacts: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying Zhou; Jonathan I Levy
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 3.295

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.