Literature DB >> 11925276

Current state of research on decision-making competence of cognitively impaired elderly persons.

Scott Y H Kim1, Jason H T Karlawish, Eric D Caine.   

Abstract

As the number of cognitively impaired elderly persons increases, the need for evidence-based assessments of their capacity to consent to medical treatment and research participation will grow. The authors conducted an electronic and manual literature search for all English-language articles examining the decision-making capacity of elderly persons with dementia or cognitive impairment, reviewing articles in relation to key areas of methodological, clinical, and policy importance. The 32 relevant studies identified were highly heterogeneous, even in their definitions and measurements of decisional capacity. Although incapacity is common, many persons with dementia are capable of making their own medical and research decisions. In Alzheimer disease, memory and executive-function deficits predict decisional impairment. Still, at least in early stages of dementia, interventions may improve decisional abilities. Short and simple cognitive screening may be useful by identifying persons in need of more intensive evaluations. The use of expert judgment-based methods may mitigate the problem of a lack of a criterion standard for competence. Research into the decision-making competence of cognitively impaired elderly persons is a growing field. It is beginning to yield findings with practical implications for preserving the autonomy and welfare of this group of vulnerable elderly patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11925276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry        ISSN: 1064-7481            Impact factor:   4.105


  73 in total

Review 1.  Ethical considerations in psychopharmacological research involving decisionally impaired subjects.

Authors:  Donald L Rosenstein; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-05-28       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Ethical issues in geriatric medicine: a unique problematic?

Authors:  Eike-Henner W Kluge
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2002

3.  Willingness of subjects with thought disorder to participate in research.

Authors:  Philip J Candilis; Cynthia M A Geppert; Kenneth E Fletcher; Charles W Lidz; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 4.  Evidence-based ethics for neurology and psychiatry research.

Authors:  Scott Y H Kim
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2004-07

Review 5.  Review of measurement instruments in clinical and research ethics, 1999-2003.

Authors:  B K Redman
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Older adults make less advantageous decisions than younger adults: cognitive and psychological correlates.

Authors:  George Fein; Shannon McGillivray; Peter Finn
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.892

7.  Psychometric Properties of a Decisional Capacity Screening Tool for Individuals Contemplating Participation in Alzheimer's Disease Research.

Authors:  Jennifer Burgher Seaman; Lauren Terhorst; Amanda Gentry; Amanda Hunsaker; Lisa S Parker; Jennifer Hagerty Lingler
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.472

8.  Ethics in Psychiatric Research: A Review of 25 Years of NIH-funded Empirical Research Projects.

Authors:  James Dubois; Holly Bante; Whitney B Hadley
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2011-12-06

9.  Frequency and correlates of advance planning among cognitively impaired older adults.

Authors:  Jennifer Hagerty Lingler; Karen B Hirschman; Linda Garand; Mary Amanda Dew; James T Becker; Richard Schulz; Steven T Dekosky
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.105

10.  Spiritual and Religious Coping of Medical Decision Makers for Hospitalized Older Adult Patients.

Authors:  Saneta M Maiko; Steven Ivy; Beth Newton Watson; Kianna Montz; Alexia M Torke
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.