Literature DB >> 11925141

Prospective evaluation of positron emission tomography for the detection of groin node metastases from vulvar cancer.

David E Cohn1, Farrokh Dehdashti, Randall K Gibb, David G Mutch, Janet S Rader, Barry A Siegel, Thomas J Herzog.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We set out to determine the ability of positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose to detect groin lymph node metastases from vulvar cancer.
METHODS: From January 2000 to August 2001, patients with squamous cell cancer of the vulva undergoing radical excision and lymphadenectomy were offered preoperative positron emission tomography. The imaging and pathologic status of each patient and groin were compared, and the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of positron emission tomography in predicting nodal metastasis were determined.
RESULTS: Fifteen patients underwent positron emission tomography prior to exploration of 29 groins. Six patients had positive scans, suggesting metastases in 8 groins. Pathologically, 5 patients had metastases in 9 groins, with positron emission tomography demonstrating metastases in 4 of 5 patients and 6 of 9 groins with disease. On a patient-by-patients basis, positron emission tomography had a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 90%, positive predictive value of 80%, and negative predictive value of 90% in demonstrating metastases. On a groin-by-groin basis, positron emission tomography had a sensitivity of 67%, specificity of 95%, positive predictive value of 86%, and negative predictive value of 86%. Positron emission tomography was more accurate in detecting extranodal metastases than disease confined within the groin nodes (P = 0.048).
CONCLUSIONS: Positron emission tomography is relatively insensitive in predicting lymph node metastasis, and a negative study is not a reliable surrogate for a pathologically negative groin. However, the high specificity suggests that positron emission tomography is useful in planning radiation therapy and as an adjunct to lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node dissection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11925141     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2002.6605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  17 in total

1.  False positive PET-CT scan and clinical examination in a patient with locally advanced vulvar cancer.

Authors:  Latoya J Perry; Onur Guralp; Ahmed Al-Niaimi; Noah A Zucker; David M Kushner
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Case Rep       Date:  2013-01-06

2.  Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up Care of Vulvar Cancer and its Precursors. Guideline of the DGGG and DKG (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry Number 015/059, November 2015.

Authors:  H G Schnürch; S Ackermann; C D Alt; J Barinoff; C Böing; C Dannecker; F Gieseking; A Günthert; P Hantschmann; L C Horn; R Kürzl; P Mallmann; S Marnitz; G Mehlhorn; C C Hack; M C Koch; U Torsten; W Weikel; L Wölber; M Hampl
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Role of PET-CT Scan in Gynaeconcology.

Authors:  Ashwini A Pawar; Digvijay B Patil; Shilpa Patel; Meeta Mankad; Pariseema Dave
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-05-05

4.  Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and FDG positron emission tomography in the management of vulvar malignancies.

Authors:  Gigin Lin; Chao-Yu Chen; Feng-Yuan Liu; Lan-Yan Yang; Huei-Jean Huang; Yi-Ting Huang; Shih-Ming Jung; Hung-Hsueh Chou; Chyong-Huey Lai; Koon-Kwan Ng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Can the radiation dose to CT-enlarged but FDG-PET-negative inguinal lymph nodes in anal cancer be reduced?

Authors:  Sabine Kathrin Mai; Grit Welzel; Brigitte Hermann; Frederik Wenz; Uwe Haberkorn; Dietmar Jörg Dinter
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  The impact of FDG-PET/CT in the management of patients with vulvar and vaginal cancer.

Authors:  N L Robertson; H Hricak; Y Sonoda; R E Sosa; M Benz; G Lyons; N R Abu-Rustum; E Sala; H A Vargas
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 7.  Imaging Features of Uncommon Gynecologic Cancers.

Authors:  Maura Miccò; Evis Sala; Yulia Lakhman; Hedvig Hricak; Hebert Alberto Vargas
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  The impact of functional imaging on radiation medicine.

Authors:  Nidhi Sharma; Donald Neumann; Roger Macklis
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  The impact of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography on the staging, management and outcome of anal cancer.

Authors:  E de Winton; A G Heriot; M Ng; R J Hicks; A Hogg; A Milner; T Leong; M Fay; J MacKay; E Drummond; S Y Ngan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Relevance of computerized tomography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with vulvar cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  Kjeld Andersen; Vibeke Zobbe; Ingrid Regitze Thranov; Karen Damgaard Pedersen
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.