Literature DB >> 11923693

Exposure-response relationships for everolimus in de novo kidney transplantation: defining a therapeutic range.

John M Kovarik1, Bruce Kaplan, Hélio Tedesco Silva, Barry D Kahan, Jacque Dantal, Stefan Vitko, Robert Boger, Christiane Rordorf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Exposure, safety, and efficacy data from the two everolimus randomized, double-blind phase 3 trials were evaluated to identify a therapeutic concentration range applicable in de novo kidney transplantation.
METHODS: A total of 695 evaluable everolimus-treated patients received either 0.75 or 1.5 mg bid in addition to corticosteroids and cyclosporine (troughs 150-400 ng/ml in month 1 and 100-300 ng/ml thereafter). A total of 3355 everolimus trough levels (Cmin) were obtained in weeks 1 and 2 and months 1, 2, 3, and 6 after transplantation. Each patient's average Cmin was calculated and the values were divided into quintiles: 1.0-3.4, 3.5-4.5, 4.6-5.7, 5.8-7.7, 7.8-15.0 ng/ml (139 patients per quintile). Efficacy was freedom from biopsy-confirmed acute rejection. Safety measures were maximum total cholesterol and triglyceride levels and minimum leukocyte and platelet counts. A sigmoid exposure-response model was used to test the significance of these Cmin-efficacy and Cmin-safety relationships.
RESULTS: Freedom from acute rejection was significantly related to Cmin with an incidence of 68% at 1.0-3.4 ng/ml, 81-86% at 3.5-7.7 ng/ml, and 91% at 7.8-15.0 ng/ml (P=0.03). The incidence of hypercholesterolemia, defined as >6.5 mmol/liter, ranged from 76 to 87% over the exposure range without a significant relation to Cmin (P=0.37). The incidence of hypertriglyceridemia, defined as >2.9 mmol/liter, rose from 59 to 77% across the exposure groups (P=0.02). Leukocytopenia, defined as <4x10(9)/liter, occurred in 11-19% of patients across the exposure quintiles showing no relationship to Cmin (P=0.76). The incidence of thrombocytopenia, defined as <100x10(9)/liter, occurred in </=10% of patients in the first 3 Cmin quintiles and was 14 and 17% in Cmin quintiles 4 and 5 (P=0.21).
CONCLUSIONS: A significantly increased risk of acute rejection was observed at everolimus trough levels <3 ng/ml. This is a lower therapeutic concentration limit when everolimus is used with conventionally dosed cyclosporine. Because hyperlipidemias responded to counter-measure therapies and thrombocytopenia had an overall low incidence of 12%, everolimus-related adverse events were manageable up to the highest troughs observed in this population of 15 ng/ml. An upper therapeutic concentration limit is likely more than 15 ng/ml but a precise value could not be derived from these data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11923693     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200203270-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  16 in total

1.  Long-term cross-validation of everolimus therapeutic drug monitoring assays: the Zortracker study.

Authors:  Björn Schniedewind; Stefanie Niederlechner; Jeffrey L Galinkin; Kamisha L Johnson-Davis; Uwe Christians; Eric J Meyer
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.681

2.  Activity of everolimus (RAD001) in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma: a phase I study.

Authors:  Andreas Günther; Philipp Baumann; Renate Burger; Christian Kellner; Wolfram Klapper; Ralf Schmidmaier; Martin Gramatzki
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Mycophenolic acid is a potent inhibitor of the expression of tumour necrosis factor- and tumour necrosis factor-receptor superfamily costimulatory molecules.

Authors:  Miranda M L Van Rijen; Herold J Metselaar; Martijn Hommes; Jan N M Ijzermans; Hugo W Tilanus; Jaap Kwekkeboom
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.397

4.  Laryngeal transplantation: research, clinical experience, and future goals.

Authors:  Samir S Khariwala; Robert R Lorenz; Marshall Strome
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 5.  Everolimus: a review of its use in renal and cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  Christopher Dunn; Katherine F Croom
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Alterations in glucose metabolism by cyclosporine in rat brain slices link to oxidative stress: interactions with mTOR inhibitors.

Authors:  Uwe Christians; Sven Gottschalk; Jelena Miljus; Carsten Hainz; Leslie Z Benet; Dieter Leibfritz; Natalie Serkova
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 7.  mTOR inhibitors and renal allograft: Yin and Yang.

Authors:  Gianluigi Zaza; Simona Granata; Paola Tomei; Valentina Masola; Giovanni Gambaro; Antonio Lupo
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.902

8.  Everolimus.

Authors:  Therese M Chapman; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Everolimus/cyclosporine interactions on bile flow and biliary excretion of bile salts and cholesterol in rats.

Authors:  Michael Deters; Gabriele Kirchner; Therese Koal; Klaus Resch; Volkhard Kaever
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 10.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of everolimus.

Authors:  Gabriele I Kirchner; Ivo Meier-Wiedenbach; Michael P Manns
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.