Literature DB >> 11923668

Ten-year follow-up study of lower thoracic hemivertebrae treated by convex fusion and concave distraction.

Kenneth M C Cheung1, J G Zhang, D S Lu, Keith D K Luk, John C Y Leong.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective review of patient records with recent clinical and radiologic assessment was conducted.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term results of fully segmented hemivertebrae treated by convex fusion combined with instrumented concave subcutaneous distraction. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Convex fusion has been described for the treatment of hemivertebrae in children, whereas distraction without fusion has been shown to enhance spinal growth. No long-term follow-up studies have combined these two methods.
METHODS: Between 1986 and 1994, six consecutive patients (5 males and 1 female) with hemivertebrae located at T11 or T12 underwent convex anterior and posterior fusion as well as concave subcutaneous distraction without fusion.
RESULTS: The mean age at surgery was 3.4 years. The mean follow-up period was 10.8 years (range, 8-14 years). There was a mean improvement of 41% in the coronal deformity, from a mean angle of 49 degrees before surgery to 29 degrees at the latest follow-up assessment. In four of the cases, this correction was achieved immediately after surgery and did not significantly change despite repeated distraction. The kyphosis improved in three cases, remained unchanged in one case, and deteriorated in two cases. In these two cases, an adjacent wedge vertebra contributed to the kyphotic deformity.
CONCLUSIONS: Although growth-mediated correction was seen in only two cases, this procedure could be recommended for children with severe deformities and decompensation in the lower thoracic spine. It is safer than hemivertebra excision, with less risk of spinal cord injury. The concave distraction produces immediate improvement in the coronal balance, such that there is no need to wait for uncertain growth-mediated correction in patients who undergo convex fusion only.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11923668     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200204010-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

1.  Convex instrumented hemiepiphysiodesis with concave distraction: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Ahmet Alanay; Ozgur Dede; Muharrem Yazici
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  A comprehensive review of the diagnosis and management of congenital scoliosis.

Authors:  Charles E Mackel; Ajit Jada; Amer F Samdani; James H Stephen; James T Bennett; Ali A Baaj; Steven W Hwang
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Short anterior instrumented fusion and posterior convex non-instrumented fusion of hemivertebra for congenital scoliosis in very young children.

Authors:  E Garrido; F Tome-Bermejo; S K Tucker; H N N Noordeen; T R Morley
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Congenital scoliosis.

Authors:  V Arlet; Th Odent; M Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-06-14       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Growth modulation in the management of growing spine deformities.

Authors:  Ibrahim Akel; Muharrem Yazici
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 1.548

6.  Posterior hemivertebra resection and monosegmental fusion in the treatment of congenital scoliosis.

Authors:  X Zhu; X Wei; J Chen; C Li; M Li; Y Qiao; B Ran
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Feasibility of Single-Stage Posterior Passive Correction and Fusion Surgery for Congenital Scoliosis in Adolescent Patients Who Have Attained Skeletal Maturity.

Authors:  Chee Kidd Chiu; Rommel Lim Tan; Siti Mariam Abd Gani; Jessamine Sze Lynn Chong; Weng Hong Chung; Chris Yin Wei Chan; Mun Keong Kwan
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2021-05-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.