Literature DB >> 11923463

Evaluation of ligand-dependent changes in AR structure using peptide probes.

Ching-Yi Chang1, Donald P McDonnell.   

Abstract

Mutations in the AR are frequently found in relapsed prostate cancers, some of which permit antiandrogens as well as nonandrogenic compounds to function as androgens. However, the molecular mechanism(s) by which these mutations enable this aberrant AR pharmacology is still unknown. To explore this issue, we used a series of LxxLL-containing peptides (L, leucine; x, any amino acid) to probe the conformation of the AF-2/coactivator binding pocket of AR and AR mutants when complexed with different ligands. We have identified in a previous study two peptides that bind to the wild-type AR in an agonist-dependent manner. Interestingly, we found these same peptides also interacted with several AR variants that are frequently found in antihormone refractory prostate cancers, in the presence of either androgens or antiandrogens. This suggests that the agonist activity of antiandrogens and other physiologically relevant ligands occurs because they, in the background of these mutations, allow AR-AF2 to adopt an active conformation. Initially, this result appeared to contradict the findings of others that suggest that coactivator binding to AR-AF2 is not required for AR activity. In probing this paradox further, however, we determined that the role of AR-AF2 appears to be to stabilize the overall structure of the receptor, allowing the amino terminus to interact with appropriate coactivators. This conclusion is supported by our finding that overexpression of the AF2-binding peptides blocks the interaction between the amino and carboxyl termini of AR but does not attenuate AR transcriptional activity. This can be explained by the fact that overexpression of the LxxLL-containing peptide or the amino terminus of AR appears to have a similar effect on the AR-ligand binding domain, as both have the ability to stabilize agonist binding by decreasing ligand off-rate. Thus, we believe that resistance in certain prostate cancers occurs as a consequence of receptor mutations that enable antagonist-and/or nonclassical ligand-bound AR to present a wild-type-like AF-2 conformation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11923463     DOI: 10.1210/mend.16.4.0818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Endocrinol        ISSN: 0888-8809


  23 in total

Review 1.  Chemistry and structural biology of androgen receptor.

Authors:  Wenqing Gao; Casey E Bohl; James T Dalton
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Molecular Basis of Steroid Action in the Prostate.

Authors:  Yuan-Shan Zhu
Journal:  Cellscience       Date:  2005-04-28

Review 3.  Ockham's razor and selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs): are we overlooking the role of 5alpha-reductase?

Authors:  Wenqing Gao; James T Dalton
Journal:  Mol Interv       Date:  2007-02

Review 4.  Drug insight: Testosterone and selective androgen receptor modulators as anabolic therapies for chronic illness and aging.

Authors:  Shalender Bhasin; Olga M Calof; Thomas W Storer; Martin L Lee; Norman A Mazer; Ravi Jasuja; Victor M Montori; Wenqing Gao; James T Dalton
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2006-03

Review 5.  Development of selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs).

Authors:  Ramesh Narayanan; Christopher C Coss; James T Dalton
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 4.102

6.  Discovery of the selective androgen receptor modulator MK-0773 using a rational development strategy based on differential transcriptional requirements for androgenic anabolism versus reproductive physiology.

Authors:  Azriel Schmidt; Donald B Kimmel; Chang Bai; Angela Scafonas; Sujane Rutledge; Robert L Vogel; Sheila McElwee-Witmer; Fang Chen; Pascale V Nantermet; Viera Kasparcova; Chih-Tai Leu; Hai-Zhuan Zhang; Mark E Duggan; Michael A Gentile; Paul Hodor; Brenda Pennypacker; Patricia Masarachia; Evan E Opas; Sharon A Adamski; Tara E Cusick; Jiabing Wang; Helen J Mitchell; Yuntae Kim; Thomayant Prueksaritanont; James J Perkins; Robert S Meissner; George D Hartman; Leonard P Freedman; Shun-ichi Harada; William J Ray
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  FoxO1 mediates PTEN suppression of androgen receptor N- and C-terminal interactions and coactivator recruitment.

Authors:  Qiuping Ma; Wei Fu; Pengfei Li; Santo V Nicosia; Guido Jenster; Xiaohong Zhang; Wenlong Bai
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2008-12-12

8.  Structural basis for nuclear receptor corepressor recruitment by antagonist-liganded androgen receptor.

Authors:  Myles C Hodgson; Howard C Shen; Anthony N Hollenberg; Steven P Balk
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 6.261

9.  Kinetic and thermodynamic characterization of dihydrotestosterone-induced conformational perturbations in androgen receptor ligand-binding domain.

Authors:  Ravi Jasuja; Jagadish Ulloor; Christopher M Yengo; Karen Choong; Andrei Y Istomin; Dennis R Livesay; Donald J Jacobs; Ronald S Swerdloff; Jaroslava Miksovská; Randy W Larsen; Shalender Bhasin
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-05-14

10.  Differential presentation of protein interaction surfaces on the androgen receptor defines the pharmacological actions of bound ligands.

Authors:  John David Norris; James David Joseph; Andrea Barreto Sherk; Dalia Juzumiene; Philip Stewart Turnbull; Stephen William Rafferty; Huaxia Cui; Erin Anderson; Daju Fan; Delita Arnelle Dye; Xiang Deng; Dmitri Kazmin; Ching-Yi Chang; Timothy Mark Willson; Donald Patrick McDonnell
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2009-04-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.