Literature DB >> 11923128

A prospective trial of preoperative chemotherapy in resectable breast cancer: predictors of breast-conservation therapy feasibility.

Lisa A Newman1, Aman U Buzdar, S Eva Singletary, Henry M Kuerer, Thomas Buchholz, Frederick C Ames, Merrick I Ross, Kelly K Hunt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer is evolving. We initiated a prospective trial of sequential preoperative paclitaxel and doxorubicin-based combination chemotherapy in patients with stage I (tumor >1 cm), II, or IIIA disease and evaluated its effect on breast-conservation therapy (BCT) eligibility.
METHODS: Pathology findings for the initial 100 consecutive patients who underwent surgery were analyzed.
RESULTS: The median tumor size at presentation was 2.4 cm, and 39% of patients were deemed eligible for BCT. After chemotherapy, the median tumor size decreased to 1.0 cm (P <.001), and 59% of patients seemed BCT eligible (BCT conversion rate 34% among patients initially assessed as BCT ineligible; P <.001). Final pathology confirmed BCT feasibility in 90% of patients assessed as BCT candidates before surgery. The pathology from mastectomy specimens revealed BCT feasibility in 11 (27%) of 41 patients deemed BCT ineligible. Multivariate analysis revealed lobular histology, multicentricity, and calcifications, but not age, initial tumor size, or nodal status to predict final pathology indicating BCT ineligibility.
CONCLUSIONS: Induction chemotherapy improves BCT eligibility for breast cancer patients. Improved breast imaging methods after chemotherapy are necessary to improve accuracy in predicting the feasibility of BCT, especially in patients presenting with diffuse calcifications or multicentricity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11923128     DOI: 10.1007/BF02573059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  20 in total

1.  Comparison of mammography, sonography, MRI and clinical examination in patients with locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  H J Shin; H H Kim; J H Ahn; S-B Kim; K H Jung; G Gong; B H Son; S H Ahn
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive lobular carcinoma may not improve rates of breast conservation.

Authors:  Judy C Boughey; Jamie Wagner; Betsy J Garrett; Lori Harker; Lavinia P Middleton; Gildy V Babiera; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Anthony Lucci; Kelly K Hunt; Isabelle Bedrosian
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Breast-Conserving Therapy in Patients with cT3 Breast Cancer with Good Response to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy Results in Excellent Local Control: A Comprehensive Cancer Center Experience.

Authors:  Marieke E M van der Noordaa; Ileana Ioan; Emiel J Rutgers; Erik van Werkhoven; Claudette E Loo; Rosie Voorthuis; Jelle Wesseling; Japke van Urk; Terry Wiersma; Vincent Dezentje; Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters; Frederieke H van Duijnhoven
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Treatment response assessment of breast masses on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance scans using fuzzy c-means clustering and level set segmentation.

Authors:  Jiazheng Shi; Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Chintana Paramagul; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Mark Helvie; Thomas Chenevert
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Impact of preoperative versus postoperative chemotherapy on the extent and number of surgical procedures in patients treated in randomized clinical trials for breast cancer.

Authors:  Judy C Boughey; Florentia Peintinger; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Allison C Perry; Kelly K Hunt; Gildy V Babiera; S E Singletary; Isabelle Bedrosian; Anthony Lucci; Aman U Buzdar; Lajos Pusztai; Henry M Kuerer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Management of patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Lisa A Newman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Relative Effectiveness of Letrozole Compared With Tamoxifen for Patients With Lobular Carcinoma in the BIG 1-98 Trial.

Authors:  Otto Metzger Filho; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Elizabeth Mallon; Barry Gusterson; Giuseppe Viale; Eric P Winer; Beat Thürlimann; Richard D Gelber; Marco Colleoni; Bent Ejlertsen; Marc Debled; Karen N Price; Meredith M Regan; Alan S Coates; Aron Goldhirsch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Common and discriminative clinicopathological features between breast cancers with pathological complete response or progressive disease in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Tomo Osako; Rie Horii; Masaaki Matsuura; Akiko Ogiya; Kaoru Domoto; Yumi Miyagi; Shunji Takahashi; Yoshinori Ito; Takuji Iwase; Futoshi Akiyama
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 9.  Neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Mediget Teshome; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.495

Review 10.  Monitoring therapeutic efficacy in breast carcinomas.

Authors:  Anne A Tardivon; Liliane Ollivier; Carl El Khoury; Fabienne Thibault
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 7.034

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.