Literature DB >> 11922937

A proposal to use a balanced scorecard to evaluate Information for Health: an information strategy for the modern NHS (1998-2005).

Denis Protti1.   

Abstract

The author was invited to assist in the development of an evaluation methodology for the Strategy. One of the conundrums of measuring the information management & technology (IM&T) function is that infrastructure investments cannot be cost justified on a return on investment basis. The balanced scorecard (BSC) is a means to evaluate corporate performance from four different perspectives: the financial perspective, the internal business process perspective, the customer perspective, and the learning and growth perspective. An IM&T BSC for Information for Health was recommended as means of allowing managers to see the positive and negative impacts of IM&T activities on the factors that are important to the NHS as a whole.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11922937     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-4825(02)00017-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Med        ISSN: 0010-4825            Impact factor:   4.589


  3 in total

1.  Improving the quality of health information: the contribution of C-H-i-Q.

Authors:  Tom Hain
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  [The balanced scorecard. "Tool or toy" in hospitals].

Authors:  A Brinkmann; F Gebhard; R Isenmann; U Bothner; U Mohl; B Schwilk
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  A mixed methods approach for measuring the impact of delivery-centric interventions on clinician workflow.

Authors:  Rhonda G Cady; Stanley M Finkelstein
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.