Literature DB >> 11922401

The effects of single and repeated administration of ebastine on cognition and psychomotor performance in comparison to triprolidine and placebo in healthy volunteers.

Z Shamsi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The cognitive and psychomotor effects of 10 mg, 20 mg and 30 mg ebastine, a second generation H1-receptor antagonist, were compared with sustained release triprolidine 10 mg (as a verum) and placebo in 10 healthy volunteers in a double-blind, randomised cross-over study.
METHODS: Following each dose, subjects were required to perform a series of tests of cognitive function and psychomotor performance at 1 h, 2 h, 4 h and 8 h post-dose on days 1 and 5. The test battery consisted of critical flicker fusion, choice reaction time, simulated car tracking task, Sternberg memory scanning task, assessment of subjective sedation (LARS) and subjective evaluation of sleep (LSEQ).
RESULTS: Ebastine at all doses investigated was not statistically significant from placebo in any of the objective tests used. However, as expected for a positive internal control, a number of objective measures were significantly disrupted by triprolidine (p < 0.05). Triprolidine produced an overall increase of the peripheral reaction time component of the simulated car tracking task (SCTT), the difference with placebo reaching statistical significance on day 1, 8 h post-dose (p < 0.05). The mean tracking accuracy scores were also significantly impaired following the administration of triprolidine after 8h on day 1 (p < 0.05). Triprolidine also produced a clear decrement on the SMST (Sternberg Memory Scanning Task), which was significantly different from placebo, at 4 h and 8 h post-dose on day 1. Subjective reports of sedation (LARS) were significantly greater at 2 h and 4 h following triprolidine administration on day 1 and ebastine (30 mg) was rated as sedative 4 h following administration on day 5. The perceived sedative activity of ebastine 30 mg was also reflected in the subjective reports on the LSEQ on day 1 (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: These results allow the conclusion that ebastine, at its recommended therapeutic doses of 10-20 mg, is demonstrably free from impairment on objective aspects of psychomotor and cognitive function in a study where the psychometric assessments were shown to be sensitive to disruptive effects, as evidenced by the action of the positive control, triprolidine 10 mg.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11922401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  8 in total

Review 1.  The economic burden of allergic rhinitis: a critical evaluation of the literature.

Authors:  Shelby D Reed; Todd A Lee; Douglas C McCrory
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Repeated-dose effects of mequitazine, cetirizine and dexchlorpheniramine on driving and psychomotor performance.

Authors:  Eef L Theunissen; Annemiek Vermeeren; Johannes G Ramaekers
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Effects of sedative and non-sedative H1 antagonists on cognitive tasks: behavioral and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) examinations.

Authors:  Takeo Tsujii; Eriko Yamamoto; Takayuki Ohira; Nozomu Saito; Shigeru Watanabe
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Brain histamine modulates recognition memory: possible implications in major cognitive disorders.

Authors:  Gustavo Provensi; Alessia Costa; Ivan Izquierdo; Patrizio Blandina; Maria Beatrice Passani
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2018-09-22       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 5.  A systematic review of amnestic and non-amnestic mild cognitive impairment induced by anticholinergic, antihistamine, GABAergic and opioid drugs.

Authors:  Cara Tannenbaum; Amélie Paquette; Sarah Hilmer; Jayna Holroyd-Leduc; Ryan Carnahan
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Ebastine in the light of CONGA recommendations for the development of third-generation antihistamines.

Authors:  S Rico; Rm Antonijoan; Mj Barbanoj
Journal:  J Asthma Allergy       Date:  2009-08-31

Review 7.  Central nervous system effects of the second-generation antihistamines marketed in Japan--review of inter-drug differences using the proportional impairment ratio (PIR)-.

Authors:  Tatsuya Isomura; Takeshi Kono; Ian Hindmarch; Norimasa Kikuchi; Aya Murakami; Kyoko Inuzuka; Seiji Kawana
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  H1 antihistamines and driving.

Authors:  Florin Dan Popescu
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2008 Jul-Sep
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.