Literature DB >> 11922255

Histomorphometrical analysis of bone formed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation by grafting with a combination of autogenous bone and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft or hydroxyapatite.

Rodolfo Jorge Boëck-Neto1, MárioFranciscoReal Gabrielli, RaphaelCarlosComelli Lia, Elcio Marcantonio, Jamil Awad Shibli, Elcio Marcantonio.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Maxillary sinus floor augmentation procedures are currently the treatment of choice when the alveolar crest of the posterior maxilla is insufficient for dental implant anchorage. This procedure aims to obtain enough bone with biomaterial association with the autogenous bone graft to create volume and allow osteoconduction. The objective of this study was to histologically and histometrically evaluate the bone formed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation by grafting with a combination of autogenous bone, from the symphyseal area mixed with DFDBA or hydroxyapatite.
METHODS: Ten biopsies were taken from 10 patients 10 months after sinus floor augmentation using a combination of 50% autogenous bone plus 50% demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA group) or 50% autogenous bone plus 50% hydroxyapatite (HA group). Routine histological processing and staining with hematoxylin and eosin and Masson's trichrome were performed.
RESULTS: The histomorphometrical analysis indicated good regenerative results in both groups for the bone tissue mean in the grafted area (50.46+/-16.29% for the DFDBA group and 46.79+/-8.56% for the HA group). Histological evaluation revealed the presence of mature bone with compact and cancellous areas in both groups. The inflammatory infiltrate was on average nonsignificant and of mononuclear prevalence. Some biopsies showed blocks of the biomaterial in the medullary spaces close to the bone wall, with absence of osteogenic activity.
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that both DFDBA and HA associated with an autogenous bone graft were biocompatible and promoted osteoconduction, acting as a matrix for bone formation. However, both materials were still present after 10 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11922255     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2002.73.3.266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  8 in total

1.  Prosthodontic rehabilitation protocols for immediate implants.

Authors:  M Viswambaran; N Thiruvalluvan
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2013-09-24

2.  Clinical evaluation of immediate implants using different types of bone augmentation materials.

Authors:  M Viswambaran; Vimal Arora; R C Tripathi; R K Dhiman
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2012-09-13

3.  β-TCP/HA with or without enamel matrix proteins for maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a histomorphometric analysis of human biopsies.

Authors:  James Carlos Nery; Luís Antônio Violin Dias Pereira; George Furtado Guimarães; Cassio Rocha Scardueli; Fabiana Mantovani Gomes França; Rubens Spin-Neto; Andreas Stavropoulos
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-05-04

4.  The use of hydroxyapatite bone substitute grafting for alveolar ridge preservation, sinus augmentation, and periodontal bone defect: A systematic review.

Authors:  Anne Handrini Dewi; Ika Dewi Ana
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2018-11-02

5.  Comparison of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2-infused absorbable collagen sponge, recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2-coated tricalcium phosphate, and platelet-rich fibrin-mixed tricalcium phosphate for sinus augmentation in rabbits.

Authors:  Chul-Hun Kim; Mi-Ha Ju; Bok-Joo Kim
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 2.080

6.  Analysis of acute sinusitis-related early failed implant surface: a combined histological, electron microscopy, and X-ray spectroscopy approach.

Authors:  Truc Thi Hoang Nguyen; Mi Young Eo; Mi Hyun Seo; Soung Min Kim
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2022-04-26

7.  A Comparison of Xenograft Graft Material and Synthetic Bioactive Glass Allograft in Immediate Dental Implant Patients.

Authors:  Manish Goutam; Namish Batra; K Jyothirmayee; Nitin Bagrecha; Poonam Deshmukh; Sakshi Malik
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2022-07-13

8.  A histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials.

Authors:  Jörg Handschel; Melani Simonowska; Christian Naujoks; Rita A Depprich; Michelle A Ommerborn; Ulrich Meyer; Norbert R Kübler
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 2.151

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.