Literature DB >> 11921006

Teaching hypothesis tests--time for significant change?

Jonathan A C Sterne1.   

Abstract

Confusion in the teaching of statistical inference dates back to the conflict of Fisher's P-values and significance tests with the Neyman-Pearson hypothesis testing approach. To avoid the well-known pitfalls arising from over-reliance on significance tests and the division of results into 'significant' or 'not significant', many medical journals now insist that presentation of statistical analyses includes confidence intervals as well as or instead of P-values. The confusion over how to report statistical analyses which is evident in the recent medical literature is matched by divergent teaching of hypothesis tests between the 16 U.K. medical schools represented at the April 2000 Burwalls meeting. Suggested guidelines for the teaching of statistical inference to medical students are presented, and possible future developments are discussed. Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11921006     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  8 in total

1.  Permutation/randomization-based inference for environmental data.

Authors:  R Christopher Spicer; Harry J Gangloff
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Statistics teaching in medical school: opinions of practising doctors.

Authors:  Susan Miles; Gill M Price; Louise Swift; Lee Shepstone; Sam J Leinster
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Statistical versus clinical significance for infants with brain injury: reanalysis of outcome data from a randomized controlled study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Nurs Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 2.075

4.  A surge of p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too).

Authors:  Joost Cf de Winter; Dimitra Dodou
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jørn Wetterslev; Janus Christian Jakobsen; Christian Gluud
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  P-value: What is and what is not.

Authors:  Kiarash Tanha; Neda Mohammadi; Leila Janani
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2017-09-25

7.  Innovations in curriculum design: a multi-disciplinary approach to teaching statistics to undergraduate medical students.

Authors:  Jenny V Freeman; Steve Collier; David Staniforth; Kevin J Smith
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance - a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  Janus Christian Jakobsen; Christian Gluud; Per Winkel; Theis Lange; Jørn Wetterslev
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 4.615

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.