Literature DB >> 11918601

Population differences in acute skin irritation responses. Race, sex, age, sensitive skin and repeat subject comparisons.

Michael K Robinson1.   

Abstract

The variability in human skin irritation responses has been well documented and can confound our ability to accurately assess differences in skin reactivity between human subpopulations. In the current analysis, results were compiled from nine acute irritation patch test studies, conducted at three test facilities over a 5-year period. Four irritant test chemicals, 20% sodium dodecyl sulphate, 100% decanol, 100% octanoic acid and 10% acetic acid, were tested in sufficient numbers of test subjects to enable the stratification of results for different human subpopulations. An increased reactivity was noted for Asian versus Caucasian subjects for each of three test chemicals, in contrast to the previously described individual study results from which these data were drawn. Male subjects were directionally or significantly more reactive to each of the test chemicals than female subjects. The oldest age cluster of subjects (56-74 years of age) was directionally or significantly less reactive than younger age clusters. There was virtually identical reactivity between self-assessed 'sensitive' and normal skin groups. Lastly, there was little correlation between the results from individual subjects tested in two or more studies with the same chemicals. These results add to our general understanding of population differences in skin reactivity and the potential implications for ingredient and product skin safety testing and risk assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11918601     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2002.460205.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  8 in total

1.  [Principles of treatment and protection for sensitive skin].

Authors:  M Kerscher
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 2.  Have We Just Scratched the Surface? A Narrative Review of Uremic Pruritus in 2020.

Authors:  Claire E Martin; Sergi Clotet-Freixas; Janine F Farragher; Gregory L Hundemer
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2020-10-15

3.  Nationwide Survey and Identification of Potential Stress Factor in Sensitive Skin of Chinese Women.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Xiao; Liyuan Qiao; Rui Ye; Fuguo Zuo
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2020-11-20

4.  Treatment of Seborrhoeic Dermatitis in Asia: A Consensus Guide.

Authors:  Wai Kwong Cheong; Chi Keung Yeung; Raghunandan Govind Torsekar; Dae Hun Suh; Rataporn Ungpakorn; Sandra Widaty; Noor Zalmy Azizan; Maria Teresita Gabriel; Hau Khang Tran; Wei Sheng Chong; I-Hsin Shih; Federica Dall'Oglio; Giuseppe Micali
Journal:  Skin Appendage Disord       Date:  2016-03-23

5.  A Survey to Identify Determinants That Influence Self-Perceived Sensitive Skin in a British Population: Clues to Developing a Reliable Screening Tool for Sensitive Skin.

Authors:  Neil Fawkes; Evi Tselenti; Neil Shah; Victoria Lappin; Neil Smith; Arjun Narasimhan; Adam B Smith
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2021-09-08

Review 6.  Irritant Contact Dermatitis - a Review.

Authors:  Kajal Patel; Rosemary Nixon
Journal:  Curr Dermatol Rep       Date:  2022-04-07

7.  The sensitive skin syndrome.

Authors:  Hadar Lev-Tov; Howard I Maibach
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.494

8.  Risk of work-related hand eczema in relation to wet work exposure.

Authors:  Tamara Lund; Sesilje Bondo Petersen; Esben Meulengracht Flachs; Niels Erik Ebbehøj; Jens Peter Bonde; Tove Agner
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 5.024

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.