Literature DB >> 11918301

Plantar impact causing midfoot fractures result in higher forces in Chopart's joint than in the ankle joint.

M Richter1, B Wippermann, H Thermann, G Schroeder, D Otte, H D Troeger, C Krettek.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Force effect (impact, extent of foot compartment deformation) and result (fracture pattern) for midfoot fractures in car occupants is known. An analysis of the processes in the foot was intended to improve car safety.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven fresh, unfrozen, unpreserved intact human cadavers (age: 36.8 (16-61) years, gender: male, race: Caucasian) were studied 24-72 h after death. In 3 cadavers (5 feet) the experimental design was established: entire cadaver fixed on a special tray in supine position, pendulum with bar impactor hitting the foot plantar to Lisfranc's joint. A custom-made pressure sensor was inserted in the ankle (A), talonavicular (TN) and calcaneocuboid (CC) joints (resolution: 1 cm2, sampling rate: 500/s).
RESULTS: Sixteen feet were measured: midfoot fractures were induced in 11 feet. The maximum pressure amounted to 1.22-2.55 MPa (2.04+/-0.412) at 0.005 0.195 s (0.067+/-0.059) after impact. The maximum pressure occurred in 8 (50%) cases in the ankle, in 7 (44%) of the TN and 1 (6%) of the CC joints. A comparison of the first 200 pressure samples after impact of all sensor fields resulted in higher forces in Chopart's joint than in the ankle (t-test: p < 0.001). These force differences were higher in cases with midfoot fractures (mixed model analysis of variance: p = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: Due to considerable forces in Chopart's joint we recommend a modification of the actual crash test dummy lower extremity model with an additional load cell that detects forces in the longitudinal direction of the foot axis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11918301     DOI: 10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00096-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  4 in total

1.  Feet rolled over by cars: radiological and histological considerations from experiments.

Authors:  J Falk; J Michael; P Eysel; M A Rothschild
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2007-03-31       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 2.  [Injuries of the midfoot].

Authors:  T Mittlmeier; M Beck
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  [Fractures of the forefoot].

Authors:  M Richter
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  An unusual midfoot injury pattern: Navicular-cuneiform and calcaneal-cuboid fracture-dislocation.

Authors:  Ali Fares; Benoit Orfeuvre; Morad Abou Al Ezz; Régis Pailhe
Journal:  Trauma Case Rep       Date:  2022-08-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.