Literature DB >> 11918287

Force transducer-based movement detection in fear conditioning in mice: a comparative analysis.

Thomas Fitch1, Benjamin Adams, Stephen Chaney, Robert Gerlai.   

Abstract

Fear conditioning (FC) allows the dissociation of hippocampal and nonhippocampal behavioral function in rodents, and has become a diagnostic tool in transgenic mouse research employed to investigate mutation-induced changes in brain function. Although the procedural details of the paradigm have been established, quantification of the behavioral output, freezing, remains problematic in mice. Observation-based techniques are time-consuming and may be subject to bias, while movement detection with photocells is imprecise. Here we describe an alternative method for movement detection, based on an electronic force transducer system that allows the quantification of acceleration forces generated by a moving subject. We compare the behavior of two inbred strains of mice (C57BL/6 and DBA/2) whose performance is known to differ in hippocampal tasks, including FC. The comparison is made using multiple techniques: the force transducer approach, and three observation-based methods, a computer-aided event-recording approach, a traditional time-sampling paper/pencil method, and a subjective impression-based scoring system. In addition, we investigate the correlation structures of behavioral elements quantified by event recording, using principal component analyses; we conclude that fear may manifest in multiple forms and in a stimulus- and genotype-dependent manner. We suggest that the force transducer system provides precise quantification of movements in an automated manner and will allow high-throughput screening for mutation and drug effects in mice. However, we also argue that fear responses can be complex, and freezing behavior may not be the only measure of fear or fear-associated memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11918287     DOI: 10.1002/hipo.10009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  7 in total

1.  Hippocampal knockdown of α2 nicotinic or M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in C57BL/6J male mice impairs cued fear conditioning.

Authors:  Yann S Mineur; Charlotte Ernstsen; Ashraful Islam; Kathrine Lefoli Maibom; Marina R Picciotto
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.449

2.  Genetic background determines behavioral responses during fear conditioning.

Authors:  L R Seemiller; S M Mooney-Leber; E Henry; A McGarvey; A Druffner; G Peltz; T J Gould
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 3.  Zebrafish antipredatory responses: a future for translational research?

Authors:  Robert Gerlai
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Automated assessment of pavlovian conditioned freezing and shock reactivity in mice using the video freeze system.

Authors:  Stephan G Anagnostaras; Suzanne C Wood; Tristan Shuman; Denise J Cai; Arthur D Leduc; Karl R Zurn; J Brooks Zurn; Jennifer R Sage; Gerald M Herrera
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.558

5.  Alarm substance induced behavioral responses in zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Authors:  Natasha Speedie; Robert Gerlai
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-04       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Delay and trace fear conditioning in C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice: issues of measurement and performance.

Authors:  Megan E Tipps; Jonathan D Raybuck; Kari J Buck; K Matthew Lattal
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  A Freely Available, Self-Calibrating Software for Automatic Measurement of Freezing Behavior.

Authors:  Felippe E Amorim; Thiago C Moulin; Olavo B Amaral
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.558

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.