Literature DB >> 11917360

[Indicators and evaluation tools for perinatal care networks].

N Mamelle1, S David, P Lombrail, J C Rozé.   

Abstract

Since the regionalization of perinatal services and the laws on the safety of child-birth were announced on the 9th October 1998, conventions and rules establishing relationships between doctors in perinatal networks have gradually been set up. In order to assess the impact, functioning and effectiveness of this care organisation on the health of mothers an childs, a common study design is essential. Such a common protocol, with the same methodology, allows the comparison of observed results from one perinatal network to another. With this objective, four leading societies in the field, the French National College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF), the National Federation of Neonatal Pediatricians (FNPN), the French Society of Perinatal Medicine (SFPM) and the Association of Computerised Medical Records in Perinatalogy, Obstetrics and Gynaecology (AUDIPOG) set up a workshop in order to elaborate a common text, which was adopted by the Administrative Councils of the four societies. This contractual text, co-operatively elaborated, is now introduced to the scientific community. It was prepared from scientific papers and international recommendations in the field of perinatal regionalization, leading to a protocol giving information on objectives, study population, study design and assessment criteria. For this, a list of questions was proposed, including the impact of perinatal network, its acceptability by doctors and families, its functioning and its effectiveness on the health of mother and child. The means of data collection were then presented, whether from institutional sources of perinatal data (completed from specific registers or studies), or from the information system France-Perinat, especially designed for the evaluation of the perinatal networks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11917360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)        ISSN: 0150-9918


  5 in total

1.  Incidence of obstetrical thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in a retrospective study within thrombocytopenic pregnant women. A difficult diagnosis and a treatable disease.

Authors:  Yahsou Delmas; Sébastien Helou; Pierre Chabanier; Anne Ryman; Fanny Pelluard; Dominique Carles; Pierre Boisseau; Agnès Veyradier; Jacques Horovitz; Paul Coppo; Christian Combe
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Appropriateness of elective caesarean deliveries in a perinatal network: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Françoise Vendittelli; Marie-Caroline Tassié; Laurent Gerbaud; Didier Lémery
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  False positive morphologic diagnoses at the anomaly scan: marginal or real problem, a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Anne Debost-Legrand; Hélène Laurichesse-Delmas; Christine Francannet; Isabelle Perthus; Didier Lémery; Denis Gallot; Françoise Vendittelli
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Does induction of labor for constitutionally large-for-gestational-age fetuses identified in utero reduce maternal morbidity?

Authors:  Françoise Vendittelli; Olivier Rivière; Brigitte Neveu; Didier Lémery
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Self-reported parental exposure to pesticide during pregnancy and birth outcomes: the MecoExpo cohort study.

Authors:  Flora Mayhoub; Thierry Berton; Véronique Bach; Karine Tack; Caroline Deguines; Adeline Floch-Barneaud; Sophie Desmots; Erwan Stéphan-Blanchard; Karen Chardon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.