M J Bartlett1, P J Warren. 1. Northwick Park Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex HA1 3UJ, UK. mjbartle@freenetname.co.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is now generally accepted that the ligamentous structures of the knee not only act as mechanical restraints but also have a neurophysiological role in joint function and protection. A report that knee joint laxity increases with exercise raised the question as to whether there is any compensatory change in joint position appreciation. OBJECTIVE: To test whether there is a compensatory mechanism for increased ligamentous laxity during normal levels of activity. METHODS: Joint position appreciation was measured, using a previously reported technique, in the knees of sportsmen at rest and after warm up. RESULTS: Joint position appreciation was found to be significantly more sensitive after warm up (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that joint position appreciation within the knee accommodates physiological changes within the ligaments and muscles after exercise.
BACKGROUND: It is now generally accepted that the ligamentous structures of the knee not only act as mechanical restraints but also have a neurophysiological role in joint function and protection. A report that knee joint laxity increases with exercise raised the question as to whether there is any compensatory change in joint position appreciation. OBJECTIVE: To test whether there is a compensatory mechanism for increased ligamentous laxity during normal levels of activity. METHODS: Joint position appreciation was measured, using a previously reported technique, in the knees of sportsmen at rest and after warm up. RESULTS: Joint position appreciation was found to be significantly more sensitive after warm up (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that joint position appreciation within the knee accommodates physiological changes within the ligaments and muscles after exercise.
Authors: Ana María de Benito; Raúl Valldecabres; Diego Ceca; Jim Richards; Joaquín Barrachina Igual; Ana Pablos Journal: PeerJ Date: 2019-11-26 Impact factor: 2.984