Literature DB >> 11916798

A quantitative, systematic review of randomized controlled trials of ephedrine versus phenylephrine for the management of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Anna Lee1, Warwick D Ngan Kee, Tony Gin.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This quantitative systematic review compared the efficacy and safety of ephedrine with phenylephrine for the prevention and treatment of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Seven randomized controlled trials (n = 292) were identified after a systematic search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry), published articles, and contact with authors. Outcomes assessed were maternal hypotension, hypertension and bradycardia, and neonatal umbilical cord blood pH values and Apgar scores. For the management (prevention and treatment) of maternal hypotension, there was no difference between phenylephrine and ephedrine (relative risk [RR] of 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-1.06). Maternal bradycardia was more likely to occur with phenylephrine than with ephedrine (RR of 4.79; 95% CI, 1.47-15.60). Women given phenylephrine had neonates with higher umbilical arterial pH values than those given ephedrine (weighted mean difference of 0.03; 95% CI, 0.02-0.04). There was no difference between the two vasopressors in the incidence of true fetal acidosis (umbilical arterial pH value of <7.2; RR of 0.78; 95% CI, 0.16-3.92) or Apgar score of <7 at 1 and 5 min. This systematic review does not support the traditional idea that ephedrine is the preferred choice for the management of maternal hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery in healthy, nonlaboring women. IMPLICATIONS: Phenylephrine and ephedrine to manage hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery were compared in this systematic review. Women given ephedrine had neonates with lower umbilical cord blood pH values compared with those given phenylephrine. However, no differences in the incidence of fetal acidosis (pH value of <7.2) or neonatal Apgar scores were found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11916798     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200204000-00028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  39 in total

1.  The effect of 0.5 L 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus 1 L Ringer's lactate preload on the hemodynamic status of parturients undergoing spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery using arterial pulse contour analysis.

Authors:  Paraskevi Matsota; Agathi Karakosta; Ageliki Pandazi; Dimitra Niokou; Kalliopi Christodoulaki; Georgia Kostopanagiotou
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 2.  Vasopressors in obstetric anesthesia: A current perspective.

Authors:  Deb Sanjay Nag; Devi Prasad Samaddar; Abhishek Chatterjee; Himanshu Kumar; Ankur Dembla
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 3.  [Ephedrine as alternative to Akrinor in regional obstetric anesthesia].

Authors:  L Aniset; C Konrad; M Schley
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  A Review of the Impact of Obstetric Anesthesia on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes.

Authors:  Grace Lim; Francesca L Facco; Naveen Nathan; Jonathan H Waters; Cynthia A Wong; Holger K Eltzschig
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Dexamethasone versus a combination of dexamethasone and ondansetron as prophylactic antiemetic in patients receiving intrathecal morphine for caesarean section.

Authors:  Akpan Imeh; Oladapo Olaniyi; Olateju Simeon; Odusoga Omotola
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.927

6.  The effect of phenylephrine on the onset time of rocuronium.

Authors:  Young Ju Won; Yang-Sik Shin; Ki-Young Lee; Woon Young Cho
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-10-21

7.  A randomised controlled trial comparing weight adjusted dose versus fixed dose prophylactic phenylephrine infusion on maintaining systolic blood pressure during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia.

Authors:  Lucy Mwaura; Vitalis Mung'ayi; Jimmie Kabugi; Samina Mir
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 0.927

Review 8.  [Caesarean sections under regional anesthesia: pros and cons of supplementary oxygen].

Authors:  H Aust; M Zemlin; F Woernle; H Wulf; D Rüsch
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  The effects of intravenous ephedrine during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Iclal Ozdemir Kol; Kenan Kaygusuz; Sinan Gursoy; Ali Cetin; Zeki Kahramanoglu; Fikret Ozkan; Caner Mimaroglu
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Development of quality of care indicators from systematic reviews: the case of hospital delivery.

Authors:  Xavier Bonfill; Marta Roqué; Marta Beatriz Aller; Dimelza Osorio; Carles Foradada; Angels Vives; David Rigau
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.