Literature DB >> 11914891

Whole-body PET with FDG for the diagnosis of recurrent gastric cancer.

T De Potter1, P Flamen, E Van Cutsem, F Penninckx, L Filez, G Bormans, A Maes, L Mortelmans.   

Abstract

This retrospective study was designed to assess the accuracy of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in diagnosing recurrence of gastric cancer. Thirty-three patients who had received surgical treatment for gastric cancer with curative intent and who had subsequently undergone FDG-PET for suspected recurrence were retrieved from the PET database. All patients were reviewed with full knowledge of prior conventional diagnostic work-up. Results were compared with a gold standard, consisting of histological confirmation or radiological and clinical follow-up. The gold standard established disease recurrence in 20/33 patients (prevalence 61%). Sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET for the diagnosis of recurrence were 70% (14/20) and 69% (9/13), respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 78% (14/18) and 60% (9/15), respectively. Of the six false-negative cases, all had intra-abdominal lesions (three had generalised abdominal metastases, one liver metastasis, one local recurrence and one ovarian metastasis). In the subgroup with previous signet cell differentiation of the primary tumour ( n=13, disease prevalence 62%), sensitivity was 62% (5/8) and specificity, 60% (3/5). Survival analysis for the entire patient group using Kaplan-Meier statistics yielded a longer survival in the PET-negative group (mean+/-SD, 21.9+/-19.0 months) than in the PET-positive group (mean+/-SD, 9.2+/-8.2 months) ( P=0.01). In the patient group with proven recurrence ( n=20), the mean survival for the PET-negative group was 18.5 (+/-12.5) months, as compared with 6.9 (+/-6.5) months for the PET-positive group ( P=0.05). Because of its poor sensitivity and low negative predictive value, FDG-PET is not suited for screening purposes in the follow-up of treated gastric cancer. However, FDG-PET appears to provide important additional information concerning the prognosis of recurrent gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11914891     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-001-0743-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  42 in total

Review 1.  18F-Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  B B Chin; R L Wahl
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  [R1 resection in the surgery of upper gastrointestinal tumors: relevance and therapeutic consequences].

Authors:  F Lordick; K Ott; A Novotny; C Schuhmacher; J R Siewert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Imaging of Gastric Cancer Metabolism Using 18 F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Mijin Yun
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 3.720

4.  Performance profile of a FDG-PET cancer screening program for detecting gastric cancer: results from a nationwide Japanese survey.

Authors:  Ryogo Minamimoto; Michio Senda; Seishi Jinnouchi; Takashi Terauchi; Tsuyoshi Yoshida; Tomio Inoue
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  FDG PET imaging in the staging and management of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Shane Hopkins; Gary Y Yang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2011-03

6.  High Diagnostic Accuracy and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration in Malignant Lymph Nodes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Linbin Chen; Yin Li; Xiaoyan Gao; Shiyong Lin; Longjun He; Guangyu Luo; Jianjun Li; Chunyu Huang; Guobao Wang; Qing Yang; Hongbo Shan
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-09-26       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Post-Resection Surveillance in GI Cancers.

Authors:  Neeraj Chaudhary; Vinay Kumaran; Vibha Varma; Sorabh Kapoor; Naimish Mehta; Samiran Nundy
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 0.656

8.  Initial Standardized Uptake Value of Positron Emission Tomography Influences the Prognosis of Patients with Localized Gastric Adenocarcinoma Treated Preoperatively.

Authors:  Nikolaos Charalampakis; Lianchun Xiao; Elena Elimova; Roopma Wadhwa; Hironori Shiozaki; Yusuke Shimodaira; Mariela A Blum; Venkatram Planjery; Jane E Rogers; Aurelio Matamoros; Tara Sagebiel; Prajnan Das; Jeffrey H Lee; Manoop S Bhutani; Brian Weston; Jeannelyn S Estrella; Brian D Badgwell; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.935

Review 9.  Imaging findings of biliary and nonbiliary complications following laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Jin-Young Choi; Myeong-Jin Kim; Mi-Suk Park; Joo Hee Kim; Joon Seok Lim; Young Taik Oh; Ki Whang Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: What the clinician should know.

Authors:  Ryan Ying Cong Tan; Joanne Ngeow
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.