Literature DB >> 11914795

Cortical activation associated with midtrial change of instruction in a saccade task.

A Matthews1, H Flohr, Stefan Everling.   

Abstract

The appearance of a visual stimulus in the peripheral visual field can elicit different saccade responses depending on prior instruction. This flexibility is commonly attributed to differences in motor set. Little is known about how the brain switches between one saccade response and another. To investigate the neural processes associated with switches between saccade motor sets, we recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) in 13 subjects, in three tasks that required subjects to generate prosaccades to a visual stimulus on 75% of the trials. On 25% of the trials, the color of the fixation point (FP) changed 300 ms prior to stimulus presentation. In the "ANTI" task, the change of the FP was the instruction to generate an antisaccade; in the "NOGO" task, subjects were instructed to maintain fixation; and in the "PRO" task, subjects were instructed to generate a prosaccade. The switch in motor set from prosaccades to antisaccades in the ANTI task and the cancellation of the prosaccade motor set in the NOGO task modulated frontal and frontocentral channels. Futhermore, the ANTI task but not the NOGO task was associated with differences at central and parietal channels compared with the PRO task. We hypothesize that the frontal activation in the ANTI and NOGO task reflects inhibition and task-switching processes, whereas the parietal activation reflects the preparation of this area for the sensorimotor transformation process that is necessary for the generation of an antisaccade.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11914795     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1003-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  7 in total

1.  Strategic modulation of the fixation-offset effect: dissociable effects of target probability on prosaccades and antisaccades.

Authors:  Leon Gmeindl; Andrew Rontal; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Contrasting instruction change with response change in task switching.

Authors:  Ian G M Cameron; Masayuki Watanabe; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  fMRI studies of eye movement control: investigating the interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor brain systems.

Authors:  John A Sweeney; Beatriz Luna; Sarah K Keedy; Jennifer E McDowell; Brett A Clementz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Neurophysiological endophenotypes of schizophrenia: the viability of selected candidate measures.

Authors:  Bruce I Turetsky; Monica E Calkins; Gregory A Light; Ann Olincy; Allen D Radant; Neal R Swerdlow
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 5.  Electrophysiological Endophenotypes for Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Emily M Owens; Peter Bachman; David C Glahn; Carrie E Bearden
Journal:  Harv Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 6.  Neurophysiology and neuroanatomy of reflexive and volitional saccades: evidence from studies of humans.

Authors:  Jennifer E McDowell; Kara A Dyckman; Benjamin P Austin; Brett A Clementz
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-10-05       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Visual-Motor Transformations Within Frontal Eye Fields During Head-Unrestrained Gaze Shifts in the Monkey.

Authors:  Amirsaman Sajad; Morteza Sadeh; Gerald P Keith; Xiaogang Yan; Hongying Wang; John Douglas Crawford
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 5.357

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.